Without looking it up, I think Redick makes far too much for what he brings to the table and Bass is sort of Millsap-ish (right?) so why trade the latter in the first place if that's the case.
Yep - if they weren't willing to give Korver 5 mil, why the hell would they take on Riddick who makes 6+ mill?
I love the logic that the Jazz have too many bigs, so they should trade one big and pick up another.
Umm Reddick is a better player than Korver. I would not mind Reddick But I agree with Numberica why trade a big then pick another back up. We have plenty of bigs.
Oh cool, so the Jazz - presumably in order to get better - trade away the best player in the deal (by far) BECAUSE they're getting a backup.Apparently logic isn't your strong suit. If what we are hearing is true the Jazz want to move Millsap or Jefferson so they can start Favors. Bass is a backup and would play backup minutes. Unlike Jerfferson and Millsap.
Basically you are trading a starter for two quality rotation players.
Oh cool, so the Jazz - presumably in order to get better - trade away the best player in the deal (by far) BECAUSE they're getting a backup.
Clearly, I am the one lacking the logic.
Oh cool, so the Jazz - presumably in order to get better - trade away the best player in the deal (by far) BECAUSE they're getting a backup.
Clearly, I am the one lacking the logic.