Joe Ingles: Article on Son's Autism Diagnosis

[Getting Traded]

I assume you mean that if the liver removed toxins as I said, cancer would not exist. If so, there are at least three different ways that statement is wrong. 1) There is no single disease called "cancer". 2) Cancers have a variety of causes, such as errors in gene transcription, faulty gene regulation, viral infections, etc., many of which have nothing to do with toxins. 3) While there are some toxins not processed by the liver, to my knowledge every potential toxin in vaccines are so processed.

Again, I welcome any correction by any trained medical professional.

Your theory of cancer is anything but universally accepted. The gene theory of cancer is just that, a theory. If they really knew what caused it, they would be able to cure it. So the liver processes the mercury and heavy metals in the vaccines 100 percent? Can you cite a study that indicates that?

 

[Sandman822]

Government subsidising or straight out giving out free vaccines to their population isn't some trick to get pharmaceutical companies big money lol, they do it to prevent mass outbreak of diseases that would cost the government a hell of a lot more money to respond with treatment to compared to the money they spend to prevent it with. Most 1st world countries health systems wouldn't be able to cope with a mass outbreak of many of the diseases they vaccinate against which is why they do it when they're often struggling to cope with the current health demands of a growing population as is.

 

[Getting Traded]

Government subsidising or straight out giving out free vaccines to their population isn't some trick to get pharmaceutical companies big money lol, they do it to prevent mass outbreak of diseases that would cost the government a hell of a lot more money to respond with treatment to compared to the money they spend to prevent it with. Most 1st world countries health systems wouldn't be able to cope with a mass outbreak of many of the diseases they vaccinate against which is why they do it when they're often struggling to cope with the current health demands of a growing population as is.

You're oversimplifying the issue. I'm not saying all vaccines should be eliminated. I'm questioning the mass flu vaccines that are given and are not always that effective in addition to including risks. That's the argument that is being pushed by the anti-vaxx people, a minority voice that has validity.

 

[Strutter]

Shout out to all the people in here siding with science and trying to explain things. It's exhausting work, but I'm glad some of y'all are willing to do it.

 

[Sandman822]

You're oversimplifying the issue. I'm not saying all vaccines should be eliminated. I'm questioning the mass flu vaccines that are given and are not always that effective in addition to including risks. That's the argument that is being pushed by the anti-vaxx people, a minority voice that has validity.

A 40 - 60% reduction in the possibility of getting the flu during flu season absolutely outweighs the extremely minimal risk of a side effect or complication from a vaccination shot. Especially when you consider the possibility of complications arising after contracting the flu, which could very well be more likely than having complications from the vaccination. If there was 100 million people getting sick from the flu on average and you could reduce that by 40 - 60% by giving your population the flu shot with very minimal risk, you'd absolutely do that if you were any government in the world to save on money/keep your workforce healthier and more productive/etc.

The best basketball analogy I can think of is like if Snyder had a hypothetical play that gave the Jazz a 40 - 60% more likely chance of scoring than normal, but you refuse to run it because of a 1 in 500,000 chance of the play leading to an offensive foul and Snyder getting ejected because of the call.

 

[One Brow]

Anyone who calls me dumb is very ignorant. Watch this video:

If there was anything anti-vaccine in that video, I missed. Could you point me to the time mark?

More likely, there was nothing to miss. The issues with the reliability of scientific publications and the eagerness of pharmaceuticals to make a profit is ZERO evidence that vaccines are not safe. Anyone who calls you ignorant on vaccines is just stating a plain fact.

 

[One Brow]

And where do you think the government gets its money. Borrowing from the fed, especially now that the rich aren't paying their fair share of the taxes. But also from our taxes.

The Federal Reserve does not lend money to the US government.

 

[One Brow]

People like Eenie are dangerous. If he doesn't want a vaccine that's fine, he can just buy life insurance, but if he starts to open his mouth and try to convince other people that vaccines are dangerous are just putting other people in harms way. It's when people like him open his mouth and try to talk about things that he has no idea about it literally harms other people.

Even him being unvaccinated can bedangerous to other people. Among other things, he could be a symptom-free carrier of a disease.

 

[One Brow]

Your theory of cancer is anything but universally accepted.

That is exactly the sort of argument I would expect from a flat-earther, creationist, or someone who claims there are no diseases caused by germs.

The gene theory of cancer is just that, a theory.

Thank you for acknowledging that my position was indeed the most reliable, most explanatory, and best supported type of knowledge that science has: a theory. Gravitation is a theory. That electricity results from the flow of electrons is a theory. The blood carrying oxygen to other parts of the body is a theory. Multiple types and causes of cancer is a theory.

If they really knew what caused it, they would be able to cure it.

Please describe what a "cure" for a gene transcription error would consist of. Be detailed.

Sorry, I was just kidding. No one thinks you have the intelligence, expertise, or understanding to know what a cure would consist it, and I'm not sure if you have the intelligence, expertise, or understanding to know what "gene transcription error" means.

So the liver processes the mercury and heavy metals in the vaccines 100 percent? Can you cite a study that indicates that?

Yes, all 0g of mercury and heavy metals present in vaccines are processed by the liver. It's basic math. 0 * 100% = 0.

 

[One Brow]

You're oversimplifying the issue. I'm not saying all vaccines should be eliminated. I'm questioning the mass flu vaccines that are given and are not always that effective in addition to including risks. That's the argument that is being pushed by the anti-vaxx people, a minority voice that has validity.

Some anti-vaccine people are just against the flu. Some say things like "too many, too soon" or encourage no vaccines at all. They all use the same faulty arguments, including you.

 

[Getting Traded]

The Federal Reserve does not lend money to the US government.

Of course it does. When the government does not have enough money to pay for its budget it borrows from the Fed. Where do you think the debt comes from?

 

[Getting Traded]

That is exactly the sort of argument I would expect from a flat-earther, creationist, or someone who claims there are no diseases caused by germs.



Thank you for acknowledging that my position was indeed the most reliable, most explanatory, and best supported type of knowledge that science has: a theory. Gravitation is a theory. That electricity results from the flow of electrons is a theory. The blood carrying oxygen to other parts of the body is a theory. Multiple types and causes of cancer is a theory.



Please describe what a "cure" for a gene transcription error would consist of. Be detailed.

Sorry, I was just kidding. No one thinks you have the intelligence, expertise, or understanding to know what a cure would consist it, and I'm not sure if you have the intelligence, expertise, or understanding to know what "gene transcription error" means.



Yes, all 0g of mercury and heavy metals present in vaccines are processed by the liver. It's basic math. 0 * 100% = 0.

So, you're saying there is no mercury in vaccines? Why are you so arrogant when you are really ignorant:

https://www.publichealth.org/public-awareness/understanding-vaccines/goes-vaccine/