What's new
By:

Jonas Waived

MDAV28 said:
As in they'd play him at C over Draymond? I don't see Jonas getting playoff minutes unless there's injury there either.
Click to expand...
No, but they don't always play Dray as the 2nd center. A lot of the Warriors regular season is resting guys and trying to go to the "death lineup" as little as possible.
 
Saint Cy of JFC said:
No, but they don't always play Dray as the 2nd center. A lot of the Warriors regular season is resting guys and trying to go to the "death lineup" as little as possible.
Click to expand...

Sure I mean it's still pretty frequent, their 2nd or 3rd most used lineup. It's basically preseason for them until playoffs anyways so Jonas will get just more garbage time then and I guess that'll make him happier?
 
TheStormofWar said:
Because it's good to have talent? I'm not heartbroken over his release, but that's a PR reason, not the real reason. He either was a cap and flexibility casualty or he quietly asked to be released. I respect it either way, but you don't release talent because they're too good. If the Jazz did that to Royce, we would be severely questioning if they drug test in the Jazz FO.
Click to expand...

It’s also good to have chemistry. Maybe Jonas doesn’t want to sit on the bench for dnp’s lots of games.
 
MDAV28 said:
I don't think Jonas was waived because he was too good at all.
Click to expand...

I think you were reading too much into a short tweet by tony jones.

I think if there were an in depth interview with DL about releasing Jonas jerebko the context would be much different and the reasoning would be much more in depth and there would be multiple reasons. Not simply: he is too good, so we don’t want him.
 
fishonjazz said:
I think you were reading too much into a short tweet by tony jones.

I think if there were an in depth interview with DL about releasing Jonas jerebko the context would be much different and the reasoning would be much more in depth and there would be multiple reasons. Not simply: he is too good, so we don’t want him.
Click to expand...

I'm sure. There's a large difference between the Jazz think he's too good to be down the bench and if Jonas thinks he's too good to be down the bench. Which I also believe will be the case in GS in games that matter.

It honestly doesn't even matter ha. The reasons behind it I believe to be much different. I mean come on guys we are one injury away from Jonas having the same exact role. Faves played 70+ games for the first time in 3 seasons. Thabo just had knee surgery. It's a little overblown to say that a reason the Jazz wouldn't keep him is that he is too good.
 
Last edited:
Why the arguing over whether O'Neale can play the 4? Or Ingles?
They don't need to: Jazz have Favors, Crowder and Sefolosha. With Favors getting ~13 mins at the 5 and maybe the same at PF, figure about 35 mins for Crowder and Thabo. O'Neale will get most of his mins backing up Ingles.
 
I think Jonas would rather have had the Jazz pickup the option, but the sunny side is appealing... potentially more bench minutes available in GS, but anytime you take a 50%+ paycut I think it sucks. Not like he's made the mega millions. It makes sense from a basketball perspective for both parties but I'm sure he'd rather be here collecting that check.
 
He was good and I wish him luck. Thanks Jonas!

Glad the Jazz did it early and had dialogue with him. Keep doing right by guys.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top