Hotdog
Well-Known Member
I know. Thats how I lmow what you were trying to do. I showed you why it wasnt working.
Just in from CNN
- Thread starter Gameface
- Start date
I know. Thats how I lmow what you were trying to do. I showed you why it wasnt working.
Joe Bagadonuts
Well-Known Member
Interesting how they are calling it the "less redacted version." Do you know what remains redacted? Two full lines and seven partial lines, all of it Grand Jury related (which can't be released by law). If you listen to mainstream media you would think that Barr is making this report all but impossible to read, and yet nearly the entire thing is available. The people crying about needing to see it, like Nadler, obviously don't really want to see it at all.
Hotdog
Well-Known Member
Of course they dont want to read it. It does more damage to Trump if they sell the story that he is still hiding something, because if they actually had to report what's in there they would have nothing. They know how idiotic their base is so they know they can get away with this. Its just a game, and all the fools are being played.
Red
Well-Known Member
At the time of Barr's offer to make accessible a less redacted report, part of the conditions were that only 12 members of Congress would be allowed to see it, and perhaps more important, and making it harder for Nadler and the Democrats to agree to the DOJ offer, is that only Nadler and one staffer of the House Judiciary Committee could view it and would not be allowed to discuss what they saw with other members of the committee.
What's the point of having Nadler read the less redacted version if he can't tell fellow Democrats on the Judiciary Committee what he read??
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/democrats-decline-barrs-offer-to-view-a-less-redacted-mueller-report/
Congressional Democrats have declined an offer by Attorney General William Barr to view a less redacted version of the report by Special Counsel Robert Mueller, as only 12 members of Congress would be able to read the report and could not discuss it with other members of Congress.
In a press conference Thursday morning, Barr made the offer to the House speaker, the Senate majority leader, the House and Senate minority leaders, the chairs and ranking members of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees, and the chairs and ranking members of the House and Senate Intelligence Committees. These members of Congress, as well as one staffer for each member, could review a less redacted version of the report in a reading room, but could not take the report out of that room or discuss it with other members of Congress.
"Unfortunately, your proposed accommodation—which among other things would prohibit discussion of the full report, even with other Committee Members—is not acceptable," congressional Democrats said in the letter to Barr. The letter was signed by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, and the ranking members of the Senate Judiciary and Intelligence Committees, Sens. Dianne Feinstein and Mark Warner.
Last edited:
I don't like Trump, but I also don't like psychiatrists offering professional opinions on people they have not seen professionally.
Joe Bagadonuts
Well-Known Member
You're telling me that if they came upon something in the report that warranted serious concern that their hands would be tied because of the way Barr offered it? I don't believe it. If Republicans were reacting in this way to an offer by an AG in a Dem administration would you feel the same way? It appears to me much more likely that they really don't want to read the report and instead want to use the fact that Barr is not publishing a completely redacted version in the New York Times as a political weapon. I wish politicians on both sides could be more honest and reasonable.
Twitter takes down 7,000 accounts linked to QAnon
Twitter has removed thousands of accounts linked to QAnon, a group known for spreading conspiracy theories and disinformation online.
Just in case any Qanon believers are here and want to suggest that Twitter did this and none of the MSM is telling us about it.
Red
Well-Known Member
Twitter takes down 7,000 accounts linked to QAnon
Twitter has removed thousands of accounts linked to QAnon, a group known for spreading conspiracy theories and disinformation online.www.cnn.com
Just in case any Qanon believers are here and want to suggest that Twitter did this and none of the MSM is telling us about it.
The growth of QAnon is pretty impressive, to the degree it has “infiltrated” the Republican Party, or the party that Trump heads, whatever it’s become. And quite the explosion of conspiracist thought in general, including many that are allying and merging these days. This was an interesting read, in that regard:
The Conspiracy Singularity Has Arrived
With the pandemic and a global uprising against racial injustice to be explained away, conspiracy communities are bleeding into each other, merging into one gigantic mass of suspicion.
www.vice.com