Bucknutz
Well-Known Member
Personality, genuine, past, family, she connects with Americans. People remember her as welcoming First Lady.Why do they like Michele?
Personality, genuine, past, family, she connects with Americans. People remember her as welcoming First Lady.Why do they like Michele?
Keep your sicko code-words to yourself.Stop it or I'll make this whole damn thread about how to make Kimchi
She has zero political experience outside of being married to a politician....Personality, genuine, past, family, she connects with Americans. People remember her as welcoming First Lady.
Don’t disagree with that at all. I’m just responding why she would get more independents than Kamala.She has zero political experience outside of being married to a politician....
Easy. Trump. The best and primary reason to vote for literally anyone else. Even Biden's corpse.Honest question to all the people who will be voting for Kamala:
Why do you plan to vote for Kamala without mentioning Trump, gender or race?
Again:Easy. Trump. The best and primary reason to vote for literally anyone else. Even Biden's corpse.
Again:Again:
Why do you plan to vote for Kamala without mentioning Trump, gender or race?
Honest question to all the people who will be voting for Kamala:
Why do you plan to vote for Kamala without mentioning Trump, gender or race?
Exactly, well-said. Just the point I was making, but with less snark, so you get fewer points. 83 out of 100. Thanks for playing.I don't think anybody here is voting for anybody based off their gender or race. But, as for not mentioning trump, the fact is the choice is inherently a relative one. For me, Kamala is far closer to my worldview and values than Donald Trump. I don't think I can take the alternative choice out of the equation. If it was Kamala and somebody who was closer to me than her I would choose the other somebody. Kamala is still quite a distance from my ideal.
Brother people are voting against the other person, as is the case for most people who vote for any presidential candidate. This isnt a unique phenomena for Kamala. Trump wouldnt get elected if there wasnt a large number of Republicans voting simply because he's not a democrat.Don’t disagree with that at all. I’m just responding why she would get more independents than Kamala.
Are you voting for Kamala for her political accomplishments or experience?
Dont independents value themselves as free thinkers who are smarter than party loyalist? It makes zero sense why Independents would favor a candidate with no experience or track record of voting.Don’t disagree with that at all. I’m just responding why she would get more independents than Kamala.
Are you voting for Kamala for her political accomplishments or experience?
She is fairly experienced. She is highly educated and smart. She's fierce and fights for what she thinks is good. Like for women's rights being the first vice president to visit an abortion clinic. I like a lot of her suggested platform. Stricter gun laws, looser weed laws, not supporting/funding genocide, support for LGBT, and support for minorities. I like that she's young and still competent. I like that she has good relations with foreign governments, and probably the main one she was a big part of key decision making with Biden that led to a very successful USA the last 4 years. It would be great to keep things going great like they have with a younger, sharper President.Honest question to all the people who will be voting for Kamala:
Why do you plan to vote for Kamala without mentioning Trump, gender or race?
Not voting for Trump, already stated.Again:
Why the **** do we need a better reason than to keep an admitted Nazi out of the white house? Please defend Trump as a viable presidential candidate without mentioning any conspiracy theories such as trumped up charges, hand-picked judges, corrupt juries, etc.
You do that and we will consider dropping Trump as a "reason" for voting against the man that fomented the ONLY direct domestic attack on our democracy in the history of the country outside of the civil war.
That’s right, seems like most people here are party loyalists. Both parties Defend terrible candidates. You’re right, Kamala doesn’t have any experience and if you had 2 candidates with no experience, most people would select the person who relates with them more and Kamala would not be the choice of independents.Dont independents value themselves as free thinkers who are smarter than party loyalist? It makes zero sense why Independents would favor a candidate with no experience or track record of voting.
Most of your top 7 points are republican talking points that don't stand up to scrutiny. The tax cuts, for example, did more to increase our debt than any other president, as the lion's share of the money given back went to large corporations and wealthy individuals, with nominal impact on the middle class and no to border-negative impact on true low-income households. See context matters. Sound bites don't cut it.Not voting for Trump, already stated.
1. Trump is not a Nazi, and calling him one waters down the real definition of a Nazi from 80 years ago.
2. Most of the posters here and any never Trumper’s will downplay most of his achievements:
1. Tax rates that benefits both individuals and companies
2. Reformed the criminal justice system
3. Take down of ISIS
4. Operations Warpspeed
5. Border crossings
6. Dropping prices of prescription drugs - executive orders
7. Middle East peace
Just to name a few…
3. Trump got to pick the judges because the Democrats put out a terrible candidate with no personality. They are putting out another terrible candidate with even less personality, less experience and almost no accomplishments other than her time as DA.
I’m not going to vote for him, but Kamala is the worst option the left could have pushed.
Why RFK over Kamala for me?
1. Genuine
2. Depth of issues
3. Can actually speak and have an off the script conversation
4. Understands what it takes to work with both parties.
5. Not in a tribe.
Easy choice with reasons.
Listening to One speech for many, just changes their opinion overnight and now are fully on board with a terrible candidate. Forget everything else.
I mean, one can assume you are either a racist, sexistt, or just a complete dumbass (or some combo) if you dont recognize that Kamala Harris has political experience.That’s right, seems like most people here are party loyalists. Both parties Defend terrible candidates. You’re right, Kamala doesn’t have any experience and if you had 2 candidates with no experience, most people would select the person who relates with them more and Kamala would not be the choice of independents.
The opportunity that the Democrats have right now, to select the best option for President, is so damn important and they go with the worst option.She is fairly experienced. She is highly educated and smart. She's fierce and fights for what she thinks is good. Like for women's rights being the first vice president to visit an abortion clinic. I like a lot of her suggested platform. Stricter gun laws, looser weed laws, not supporting/funding genocide, support for LGBT, and support for minorities. I like that she's young and still competent. I like that she has good relations with foreign governments, and probably the main one she was a big part of key decision making with Biden that led to a very successful USA the last 4 years. It would be great to keep things going great like they have with a younger, sharper President.
What don't you like about her?
Just as much as Vance, like I said yesterday…I mean, one can assume you are either a racist, sexistt, or just a complete dumbass (or some combo) if you dont recognize that Kamala Harris has political experience.