What's new
By:

Kamala Harris for Pres

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 365
  • Start date Start date
fishonjazz said:
You left some context out. Just like trump. He said "She failed her bar exam. She did not pass her bar exam" (another example of trump having no depth about basic topics)

She actually did pass the bar exam though.

Harris, who graduated from law school in 1989, passed the bar exam on her second try in 1990.
Despite the initial failure, Harris's subsequent success illustrates that early setbacks do not define long term professional capabilities.

California has a notoriously difficult bar exam. In 1985, the Los Angeles Times wrote that its pass rate "has generally hovered around 50%."





Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Trump said she didn't, so she didn't. Immediately upon saying that around 45% of Americans started saying it as well. Since their cult leader said it, it must be true.
 
fishonjazz said:
In 1985, the Los Angeles Times wrote that its pass rate "has generally hovered around 50%."
Click to expand...
Okay, so if you're above average then you pass and if you're below average then you fail. In trying to find a US President, I would hope we'd be trying to find the best willing to take the job and not someone who has proved herself to be below average.

Kamala Harris isn't a winner. She has been installed on the 2024 ticket. Kamala will be US President, but that too will be because of the system that has been installed. It is what it is and I'm at peace with it, but I find humor in the side working the levers being the same one's crying about democracy being in danger. You are being assigned a US President whose strongest qualification is that she reliably does what she's told.
 
LogGrad98 said:
Trump said she didn't, so she didn't. Immediately upon saying that around 45% of Americans started saying it as well. Since their cult leader said it, it must be true.
Click to expand...
If only 45% are saying it then that is a problem because it is true. Kamala did fail an attempt at the California bar exam. You can add context and point to other attempts, but Kamala did fail an attempt at the California bar exam. Fact.
 
I'm not sure failing a bar exam once, then passing it the second time, becoming the DA of SF and then moving on to be the Attorney General of the biggest goddamn state in the US is a path honest people would describe as a failure.

I don't get it tbh. If I did that, I would consider myself a tremendous success story.

I guess keep trying to explain it away as sucking a bunch of dick, it's really persuasive.
 
Last edited:
Safetydan said:
I'm not sure failing a bar exam once, then passing it the second time, becoming the DA of SF and then moving on to be the Attorney General of the biggest Goddamn state in the US is a path honest people would describe as a failure.

I don't get it tbh. If I did that, I would consider myself a tremendous success story.

I guess keep trying to explain it away as sucking a bunch of dick, it's really persuasive.
Click to expand...
Pretty sure Al is John Bender's dad.
 
Al-O-Meter said:
Okay, so if you're above average then you pass and if you're below average then you fail. In trying to find a US President, I would hope we'd be trying to find the best willing to take the job and not someone who has proved herself to be below average.

Kamala Harris isn't a winner. She has been installed on the 2024 ticket. Kamala will be US President, but that too will be because of the system that has been installed. It is what it is and I'm at peace with it, but I find humor in the side working the levers being the same one's crying about democracy being in danger. You are being assigned a US President whose strongest qualification is that she reliably does what she's told.
Click to expand...

The discussion was her passing of the bar exam. She did pass.

As for the rest of your post, Donald Trump is the other option. Literally the most unqualified candidate in history. Zero public service. Zero political experience. Was elected president.


Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
  • Like
Reactions: MVP
Al-O-Meter said:
If only 45% are saying it then that is a problem because it is true.
Click to expand...

Your reading comprehension is poor.

Its not true. She did pass the bar.

Trump said she didn't pass the bar. She did. He was incorrect.

If he simply said she failed the bar then he would be correct.
That isn't all he said though. He said she didn't pass.

One person who actually didn't pass the bar exam is trump.
Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: MVP
fishonjazz said:
The discussion was her passing of the bar exam. She did pass.

As for the rest of your post, Donald Trump is the other option. Literally the most unqualified candidate in history. Zero public service. Zero political experience. Was elected president.


Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Yeah but he knows things like hurricane paths better than anyone else. That's what he does. He corrects weather experts and he knows things.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: MVP
I watched a majority of that interview at the NABJ.

Dude, he got destroyed. He was doing his best to tiptoe through the minefield of his own rhetoric in front of that audience and it didn't go well. His effort to avoid questions through extended ranting was hilarious. Gish-galloping to run out the clock.

People here and other hogs want to call him brave by going into the "lions den" lmao. Nice. It's a hostile room due to his history of being antagonistic toward their community and other marginalized groups. He could avoid that by not being a ****** guy with ****** policy proposals. It was dumb to go. I don't give him the points for being brave because being bravely ****ed-up means nothing to me.

Why is a room full of black journalists a "lions den"? It doesn't have to be.
 
Safetydan said:
I watched a majority of that interview at the NABJ.

Dude, he got destroyed. He was doing his best to tiptoe through the minefield of his own rhetoric in front of that audience and it didn't go well. His effort to avoid questions through extended ranting was hilarious. Gish-galloping to run out the clock.

People here and other hogs want to call him brave by going into the "lions den" lmao. Nice. It's a hostile room due to his history of being antagonistic toward their community and other marginalized groups. He could avoid that by not being a ****** guy with ****** policy proposals. It was dumb to go. I don't give him the points for being brave because being bravely ****ed-up means nothing to me.

Why is a room full of black journalists a "lions den"? It doesn't have to be.
Click to expand...

Agreed on all of the above. It is only the lion's den because he isn't a friend of black Americans. Or any other shade besides orange, white, cream, snow, and heavily over-tanned or spray-tanned of all of the above.


But I would have loved to have seen them assemble clips of him actually saying that stuff, play it for him, then watch him squirm for real when he couldn't use his favorite defense, "I didn't say that". Play the clip, see his big orange fat face waving those tiny hands around, saying the stupid **** he actually said, then ask him to explain what he meant. Boom. That'd be the best interview ever.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top