LogGrad98
Well-Known Member
Contributor
20-21 Award Winner
2022 Award Winner
2023 Award Winner
2024 Award Winner
I really think his pushing protestors out of the way for a ****** Bible photo op was testing the waters to see how the public would accept him using force against protestors, and ultimately against the populace as a whole. The dude dreams of being a dictator no doubt, and Project 2025 shows that his inner circle has been actively working on the plan for this for years. The threat is real. The biggest thing he is doing beyond grooming his followers for a mini-Rwanda-style uprising is desensitizing the American people against his crazy rhetoric to downplay the very real threat he poses. And largely, it's working. Let's hope he can't make enough headway by November and gets kicked from the election cycle without enough force at his command to do much more than a few localized riots, but I'm sure he dreams of a full-on uprising and civil war if he loses. And that would be treason and hopefully he would be given the death penalty should that occur to show other would-be dictators not to try that **** here.
Yup, he's 100% in desensitizing mode. And it's working. He has been since day one really, but lately the lies have become even more preposterous and his flock eat them up. He is trending hard toward a loss and I think he knows it so now it's time to get them riled up to the point where the truth matters not one iota and they blindly do whatever he tells them to. We saw it on Jan 6 but he needs it to happen in every State across the nation this time. It's so predictable just like it was leading into the 2020 election. We were posting about that exact scenario here on JFC months before election day. I hope Joe and Kamala are in deep discussions with our military leaders and preparing for it.
PJF
Well-Known Member
Red
Well-Known Member
PJF
Well-Known Member
The ladies of the View and the anti-trumpers of jazzfanz
View: https://x.com/BrentBozell/status/1838317328754266547
View: https://x.com/BrentBozell/status/1838317328754266547
Bucknutz
Well-Known Member
Another reason to be a Never Kamala…what disaster of an idea! It’s also why I call her a left wing extremist.
View: https://x.com/kyrstensinema/status/1838630653677453484?s=46&t=BMMZjW7vq0_zwnmLDjNTgQ
View: https://x.com/kyrstensinema/status/1838630653677453484?s=46&t=BMMZjW7vq0_zwnmLDjNTgQ
LogGrad98
Well-Known Member
Contributor
20-21 Award Winner
2022 Award Winner
2023 Award Winner
2024 Award Winner
Do you have other ideas to balance out a stacked and obviously corrupt supreme court that both sides would accept? Only 2 options, impeachment, which no Republican politician will support since, like all politicians, they care more about power than morals, or something like what she is proposing. I definitely don't like this idea since it removes all balance in the legislature since the filibuster was one of the few things the minority party had at their disposal to counter legislation they disagree with. If this is the way they want to go then they need to adopt super-majority voting in both houses for all legislation in the future, or something like that.
By the way, doesn't a constitutional amendment already require a super-majority and state radification?
Bucknutz
Well-Known Member
We are going to stop this conversation right here before we move on.
Stacked? It wasn’t stacked, Trump got to pick 3 because RGB wouldn’t retire. Then the right played the same games that was done by Harry Reid with the “Nuclear Option”.
Why do both sides need to accept? Both sides don’t accept the president, the house or senate. Both sides don’t accept appointments for political positions.
This is an extreme leftist talking point. They don’t like who’s on it and now want to change it. If it was a left leaning court the left wouldn’t be bitching about it all the time.
I keep being reminded by a certain poster on here that says “elections have consequences”. This is a great example of it. You run terrible candidates, you won’t get your desired outcomes.
Why do we have to balance it out? How is it unbalanced? Maybe they are the ones that are balanced and our ideas or desires of government are the ones that are unbalanced.
LogGrad98
Well-Known Member
Contributor
20-21 Award Winner
2022 Award Winner
2023 Award Winner
2024 Award Winner
LOL you get so outraged whenever you have nothing to offer. Yes a corrupt supreme Court needs to be BALANCED OUT somehow. Do you disagree? Or do you disagree the are corrupt? You like to throw around the "FAR LEFTIST" insult every time it pisses you off that you have no response. Look, you can try to wear the "just barely right wing" mask, but when it gets to discussions of substance you show your true colors. Let us know how it goes voting for Trump. Everyone knows that's exactly what you are doing. And yes, I'm voting for Kamala, but I'm transparent about why and what I really feel about her. So don't bother providing any more "centrist" fakeness. Just drop the act and get back on board with PJF in your worship of all things conservative.
Bucknutz
Well-Known Member
First, not outraged at all.
Why do I need anything to offer? I think the way it is, is great. Why change it? It will naturally change over time by who is selected for POTUS. Democrats get elected when there comes openings and then it will be left leaning. If that happened and the right starts bitching about I will say it’s a right wing extremist idea.
Why do you consider it corrupt? You haven’t even defined why it’s corrupt. Should we balance out all the politicians because I think they are corrupt?
Again, look at what I consider left wing extremism, look at my history.
I talk about the same things over and over again. Expanding the Supreme Court, getting rid of the electoral college, free speech regulation, 2nd amendment infringement.
I’m not for any of it, none. People who do, have extremist views. And the ones who are pushing for it are on the far left.
Yep, normal regular views. This is one of them. You obviously want to shake up our government, only for the things you dont like.
I like keeping it the same because it’s the best government in the world. The fringe on the left and right are the ones that want to ruin it.
Not voting for him. I don’t care if you think otherwise.
It seems like you’re the one outraged.
I don’t care if you vote for Kamala, bully for you. But it’s not going to stop me from posting anti-Kamala posts. You’re fine with people always posting anti-Trump or anti-RFK. But when it comes to your candidate you get outraged. Very Emotional about it.
Your initial response was an emotional one. You didn’t defend the removal of the filibuster. You went straight to the Supreme Court because you don’t like it. Just like the senator said, it’s very short sighted. The big picture, it’s a terrible idea. Just like everyone was saying about Harry Reid’s nuclear option. Everything everyone was warning about is why you got Trumps 3 picks. Now you’re in favor to make an even worse idea.
Bucknutz
Well-Known Member
Again before you start trying to say my views are fake. Just maybe think that people are in the middle and have a moderate views.
This is the definition of what my beliefs are.
Moderate policies - don’t make big changes to the government (stacking SC, speech regulation ect…)
Redistributive policies - government healthcare, government funded college education, UBI, ect…
Don’t aline with either party.
I love the last sentence, extremists from both sides will describe me as a right wing or left wing when they oppose my views.
Looks like that’s what happened when you opposed my views.
This is the definition of what my beliefs are.
Moderate policies - don’t make big changes to the government (stacking SC, speech regulation ect…)
Redistributive policies - government healthcare, government funded college education, UBI, ect…
Don’t aline with either party.
I love the last sentence, extremists from both sides will describe me as a right wing or left wing when they oppose my views.
Looks like that’s what happened when you opposed my views.