What's new
By:

Kanter for Randle?

Kanter for Randall

  • Total voters
    40
Why would the Lakers, who are paying LT out the ***, want to trade a cheap 4-year rookie contract for a rookie contract that is on it's final year?
 
Kanter and Evans and a #1 (lottery protected for 3 years
) to Portland for LaMarcus Aldridge
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: MVP
Where is the "Don't trade for a person who you cannot even spell his easy name." option?

To answer it, no Lakers wouldn't accept. But it would be a good change of air if it ever happened. The Jazz also would be back to dealing with a bigman struggling to kick the ball out when struck inside. Just when Kanter started doing this, trade him and get another one to teach to kick the ball out? Sounds irritating.
 
Last edited:
Eenie-Meenie said:
Kanter for Randle, straight up -- Would you do it?
Click to expand...

Randle upside = higher
Randle downside = lower
(i.e., Kanter a better known entity)

Randle = much more attractive contract and will need to tie up more cap space.

Jazz would do it
Lakers would not
 
Yes. I previously posted this on another thread. The lakers could use a center and randle would be good alongside favors. Jazz would have to add in at least a future 1st though. Given that the top 2 picks in next years draft are going to be centers, they might wait. There will also be FA Greg Monroe.


Sent from the JazzFanz app
 
berkkobe said:
Enes Kanter will dominate the league by December.

If not ban me.

Also knicks will be the champions

jazz sucks
Click to expand...

Berkkobe doesn't own up to his debt. He said the bolded last year and he's still around.

Also, questionable judgement on both parts.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top