Of course. Not one person on this board expected you to behave consistently regarding the notions of "due process". You lived down to everyone's expectations.
The person who makes an accusation is always a victim. Whether the assault happened or not, the accuser faces people who call them liars, hurtful, vengeful, insane, and/or many other things. So, when there is a false accusation, there are two victims.
Because the left understands how your attitude, which was the prevailing attitude for thousands of years, makes actual victims of assault into victims a second time, and also lets actual rapists off the hook. The consequences of reporting an actual rape are already horrific, which means false accusations are very rare.
Here is an example of what a happens when your notions are followed.
https://www.propublica.org/article/false-rape-accusations-an-unbelievable-story
Please, go on about how letting rapists get away with rape (which is the result of the process you uphold) is a good example of your "principles and morals".
Yes, the entitlement to an answer to a loaded question. It's a thing. A really really annoying and pathetic thing.I really love it when posters throw a fit when they think you aren't answering their questions (even if you do!), and then completely disappear when they get asked a direct question in return.
I am victim. I am a victim of all the vitriol and hurtful things said by you and everyone else. Which makes you a victimizer. A perpetrator, a predator, and a beast.
So the false accuser is a victim? Got it. I have to say I am actually not surprised. Nothing the left says anymore is surprising. And you are like a perfect sample of what the left is. If I need to take the temperature I just need to ask you a question. I'll give you props for being crazy before the rest went crazy. You were selling this stuff long before anyone else on here I can remember. Bravo on successfully helping spread the message.
Isnt it the left who loves to help rapists and murders get out of prison? I dont think that is a characteristic of the right. The right has a pretty good record of punishing the rapists.
There is a huge difference between Congress taking advantage of the ability to delay a vote in order to prevent a nomination and political enemies slandering someone's reputation. Or did I somehow miss the horrible and unsubstantiated claims that the Republicans were throwing out about Garland?Agreed.
It’s interesting that those whining about “process” seem to have forgotten Merrick Garland. What about his “due process?” Moscow Mitch wouldn’t even let the senate debate confirming him. But I guess process only matters sometimes.
Stay on target- this is about "due process." Merrick Garland didn’t even get a chance to make his case in front of the senate, meanwhile Kavanaugh is doing just fine, holding one of the most powerful positions in the country.There is a huge difference between Congress taking advantage of the ability to delay a vote in order to prevent a nomination and political enemies slandering someone's reputation. Or did I somehow miss the horrible and unsubstantiated claims that the Republicans were throwing out about Garland?
Oh, I didn't realize I was supposed to let you twist examples to fit your narrative no matter what sort of mental gymnastics that takes. The fact is, these two cases are not the same at all.Stay on target- this is about "due process." Merrick Garland didn’t even get a chance to make his case in front of the senate, meanwhile Kavanaugh is doing just fine, holding one of the most powerful positions in the country.
Considering the "process" we are talking about here is the nomination of a justice to the Supreme Court, it's as good a comparison as there is. You just don't like it because it demonstrates your hypocrisy on the issue.Oh, I didn't realize I was supposed to let you twist examples to fit your narrative no matter what sort of mental gymnastics that takes. The fact is, these two cases are not the same at all.
I'm a hypocrite in your eyes for being able to see the massive differences between these two situations (including process differences)? I guess I can live with that.Considering the "process" we are talking about here is the nomination of a justice to the Supreme Court, it's as good a comparison as there is. You just don't like it because it demonstrates your hypocrisy on the issue.
I really love it when posters throw a fit when they think you aren't answering their questions (even if you do!), and then completely disappear when they get asked a direct question in return.
For sure, but this isn't about you. That was a JazzyFresh callout.It's a message forum, dude. Don't put too much into it. Sometimes I respond multiple times a day, sometimes I go MIA for days and sometimes I don't respond because I know there's no point.