Top-10 really means top-5 but I’m speaking conservatively.
If for example you can have two of Flagg, Harper, Ace, VJ, or Tre and they hit, you have just turbocharged the ceiling of outcomes. I also think it’s the only way you could double-dip in this draft and I don’t think the other team would do it since Lauri had a bad year and we overpaid the **** out of him. I think the best value Key can provide a contender is being trade bait, and I think Wolf has a higher ceiling than Flip. Murray’s contract is actually pretty palatable for a deep-rebuilding team, Paul George is definitely overpaid but not actually a terrible player and again is palatable for a rebuilding team (whose best cap plays are being dumping grounds for bad salary on desperate win-now teams).
It's interesting and I get the logic. Feels like we are trading low on Lauri and giving up on Flip and/or Keyonte too early though. It definitely has the potential to look like a horrible trade if any of them improve significantly.
The other reason I would hesitate to do all the things you said is that I do believe that it's good to have some functional vets for development. Specifically players that need to develop playmaking ability need to have someone to play make for. Collins was really important for Collier this year for example. It gets tricky on how to tank honorably and keep functional vets around while not being at risk to give up an important pick to OKC, so I get that it might not all be possible.
Lastly, I'm not super high on the upside of anyone outside of Flagg and Harper in this draft. I don't think that VJ, Tre, or Ace are super likely to be better than Lauri was last year for example. I do think there will be some very good players and potentially all stars outside of the top two, but I think it is very difficult to know who that will be.