A player chokes one time and is therefore never clutch again. Got it.
--Magic Johnson"I'm going to take LeBron James," he said. "I think he's the best player in the league, in the world. I think Kevin Durant is proving that he is going to dominate this league for a long time, as well, but right now I'm taking LeBron James."
"LeBron James is better because he's smarter," he said of the growth in James' game. "He added to his game a post up game, which has made him unguardable, and also made him, even when you double-team him, and we saw this in Game 4, he was able to make all his teammates better by taking the double-team and kicking it out for easy jump shots or 3-point shots.
"Before, my biggest knock on LeBron was he was just playing off his God-gifted talent. He was just the best athlete. But he didn't play with his head to match that. Now he's playing with his talent and with his head, and wow, watch out. This guy is going to set the league on fire for a long time."
--Charles Barkley"I do think he can be better than Michael. I thought I would never compare somebody to Michael Jordan. But this guy, LeBron James, he does everything well. Michael did everything well. LeBron James is just bigger, stronger, faster. That's the only difference."
--Oscar Robertson"Psh...Lebron is in a class by himself"
A player chokes one time and is therefore never clutch again. Got it.
It's amazing how quickly people forget how many times LeBron went into an indescribable shell when his season was on the line. I have no idea which time you are referring to. Take your pick. Physically, LeBron is in a league of his own; I grant you this. However, I cannot remember in recent history someone choking so many times in big games. LeBron has two bronze medals; Durant has never gotten anything other than gold. This is indicative of his clutch factor and ability to win. It is true that LeBron and Chris Paul made big plays in the final game, but Durant is only 24, so the coach should call on the older vets.
Maybe you missed the years when Durant's teams were lucky to beat the Raptors at home?
Lebron's teams have never done as poorly as Durant's, and Durant's teams have never achieved the same level of greatness as Lebron's.
I have no idea what you're talking about. I can't think of a single "great" team he played on until he stacked the deck in Miami (last year's and perhaps this year's). These "great" teams you speak of made it to the Eastern conference finals/finals once. Oh and despite LeBron having four other Allstars on his current team (two this year; one starting), the upstart KD is leading his team to the best record in the league despite playing in a much more difficult conference. The argument of team record for a very young player on crap team is hard to quantify. That’s why LeBron left Cleveland of course. Both players have done very well in their first five seasons. Durant had a much more pathetic team when he started, so it’s more complex than having one fantastic player and crap players surrounding him.
LeBron’s teams
35-47
42-40
50-32
50-32
45-37
Olympic Bronze
Fiba world Championships Bronze Medal
Olympic Gold
Olympic Gold
Durant’s teams
20-62 (Last Place)
23-59
50-32
55-27
47-19 (Lock Out = 58-24)
FIBA World Championships Gold Medal (9-0 @ 22; MVP)
Olympic Gold Medal (8-0; highest points average on the team 19.5/game)
When did I ever say his Cavs teams were great? They were ****, and that's exactly the point. When Lebron was surrounded with ****, he carried them to the Finals. When Durant was surrounded with ****, they looked like, well, ****. No, I don't think that would be the case now, though.
But this is all a bit beside the point, and I think you would agree. We're comparing the Lebron of now to the Durant of now.
Let me just say I love Durant, and think he's undoubtably the second best player alive, and will go down as one of the best ever even if he never wins a ring. But when comparing him to Lebron, he's only better at one thing: shooting (though, Lebron has actually shot over 40% from 3 the past two seasons). The main argument in favor of Durant is that he's supposedly a better closer--something that I don't necessarily agree with, but even if we want to operate under the condition that this is true, that does not mean he is the better player, because I hope most would at least agree that the difference is not night and day. If you give Durant, say, a 10/10 on the clutch scale, then I think you would at least give Lebron an 8? In my opinion, it's even closer (and am not convinced Durant actually is a better closer). For instance, I'd say Reggie Miller is slightly better than Durant in terms of clutchness, but that doesn't mean I think he's the better player; Durant is far better at most other aspects of the game. Now, Durant is obviously closer to Lebron than Miller is to Durant, but the basics behind the analogy still stand. Lebron is better at EVERYTHING other than shooting, imo, and closing games according to the Durant apologists. That does not equate to him being the better player.
Jordan says the final word on who is his heir:
[video=youtube_share;INX7J77YuXQ]https://youtu.be/INX7J77YuXQ