What's new

Kevin Love..

He talked about Favors/Gobert and Love today in his weekly podcast, the same day this thread was made.....
What did he say about favors/gobert and love?
Did he say that the jazz were never in discussions with cleveland and he thinks love/gobert is better than favors/gobert?
 
What did he say about favors/gobert and love?
Did he say that the jazz were never in discussions with cleveland and he thinks love/gobert is better than favors/gobert?

Locke isnt breaking any news. He was just talking about what Windhorst said this past week. I don't remember exactly what he said, but he questioned something about Love, but he never said Favors/Gobert > Love/Gobert.
 
Um, last I heard, which was last night, LeBron is committed to Cleveland. Get those dumb rumors outta here!

So you don't think Burks + O'Neale is enough for Lebron? Fine.I guess I'd be OK with adding Bolomboy to the trade, but now it seems we're just gutting the team for a one year rental of a guy who hasn't won a championship without another star player.
 
So if Locke is indicating the Jazz see Favors/Gobert > Love/Gobert, that doesn't seem to bode well for Cy's Quin theory on Favors/Gobert.
 
I listened to him today and he didnt say that lmao.

I wasn't talking about today's podcast.

Listen to the 7/25 Podcast from the 15 - 19 minute mark.

He clearly says he doesn't think, all things considered, a Love/Gobert combo is an upgrade over Favors/Gobert.
 
I wasn't talking about today's podcast.

Listen to the 7/25 Podcast from the 15 - 19 minute mark.

He clearly says he doesn't think, all things considered, a Love/Gobert combo is an upgrade over Favors/Gobert.

Yeah he never said Favors/Gobert > Love/Gobert. He just said he questions if Love/Gobert > Favors/Gobert as much as people think (if at all), but he never said anything absolute. Basically the same thing he said on today's podcast, but this one was more detailed.
 
Locke isnt breaking any news. He was just talking about what Windhorst said this past week. I don't remember exactly what he said, but he questioned something about Love, but he never said Favors/Gobert > Love/Gobert.

He said and I listened to it tonight, that he questioned whether Love-Gobert would be better than Favors/Gobert because people underestimate the defensive contribution of Favors/Gobert.
 
Back
Top