I think it is pretty clear that Keyonte by year 3 is a much better offensive player than Mitchell: he is able to produce the exact same amount of points on the same splits and he is doing it without any good veteran players setting him up. Mitchell in his 3rd year had Ingles and Conley. And, on top of that, Keyonte is the leading playmaker on the team, while Mitchell was only the 3rd in APG.
Keyonte is clearly and firmly on the All Star trajectory. He would be an All Star this year (as Mitchell became in Year 3 with the identical stats) had he played on a veteran team instead of the perpetually rebuilding Jazz.
Keyonte is clearly and firmly on the All Star trajectory. He would be an All Star this year (as Mitchell became in Year 3 with the identical stats) had he played on a veteran team instead of the perpetually rebuilding Jazz.