in new orleans he was. i was thinking more the utah version. by cy reminded me in another thread to take into account scoring and efficiency inflation and with that, he's in that group, but probably not better yet than most of those guys.Pistol Pete was pretty good as well.
Lets go over the top here. I promise I will tone down this hyperbole but this one I just have to share.
Year 3 Key (age 22 seasom) vs....
Year 3 Don (age 23)
Year 3 Kyrie (age 21)
Year 3 Dame (age 24)
Year 3 Ant (age 21)
Ok I will stop now.
That’s true, but on the other hand he’s our only threat that can create for himself so should be getting the brunt of attention from opposing teams already. A better team around him should make things easier for him.The unsustainability would come from the Jazz becoming good and teams overall taking them more seriously
Mitchell's terrible floater probably accounts for the entire difference in the true shooting percentage between the two. Hated when he took that shot.Mitchell had such a nice looking shot. The way he got perfectly vertical and balanced with his legs stood out. It’s weird he never quite became an elite shooter. I think it was his touch, more mechanical than feel. Didn’t have that ineffable quality to push the ball in the great ones do.