Wow...
So if we already have Harris for at least 2 more years (with all his NBA savyness and experience)... why are we picking Knight at #3 again?
Wow...
So if we already have Harris for at least 2 more years (with all his NBA savyness and experience)... why are we picking Knight at #3 again?
Because, of course, similar measurements mean they play the exact same way, right?
This keeps coming up with Jazz's No. 3, 12 picks: Utah can find another PG or SG at 12 if Jazz pass on Walker, Knight. But there's not another Kanter on the board, in terms of his size, shooting skill, youth and potential. O'Connor is big on length, size and interior depth. Easier to get a SG via trade/signing than drafting a "special" young center at No. 3.
Ok, I can see there's no fooling you.. so here's a quote from BTS instead:
Take from it what you may...
I mean, if you want to make the argument that Kanter will be better than Knight, that's one thing, but arguing to not draft Knight because he has similar measurements to Devin Harris is quite another.
Knight is already a much better shooter than Harris.
I thought maybe Knight got better as the season went on, but I checked his last 5 games and he shot 32%. In the 5 games before that he shot 34%. It seems like he got progressively worse.
I know he had some Sundiata Gaines moments, but so did Sundiata Gaines.