If you feel I have materially misrepresented your previous statements about homosexuality, evolution, and marriage feel free to correct it beantown.
My view is all about embracing that we are different, and we as a society should not try to force everybody to view people "the same". You cannot compare heterosexual relations and homosexual relations as being the same. Like the saying goes " You can't compare apples to oranges"
We are all different and that's what makes the world and our country great. Our country has specific laws and ways that govern our differences. From our religions, our race's, and our genders. African American and Indians have different backgrounds and therefore there are governmental rights to each of these people. My wife who is part Indian has different governmental rights and benefits that differ from other citizens, like me.
- the basic scientific fact of the relations are merely the backbone of my view. Biologically homosexual and heterosexual relations are complete opposite. But I AM NOT SAYING THAT IS A BAD THING!
-Just like men are different from women. So are heterosexual and homosexuals.
-Homosexual and heterosexual relations have different dynamics and issues within themselves that are unique only to those type of relationships.
-Heterosexuals can create life and usually build families through generations. They pass on genetics and heredity and need to be held responsible and have rights protecting them because of that power. Their relations are the fundamental purpose for our species continuing on and evolving. They deal with different factors from birth control, working family woman, and basically all the dynamics of a man and woman relationship.
-Homosexual relations do not have procreating powers. (not a bad thing). They need rights and protections that focus on the dynamics of same gender relations. The dynamics of gay adoptions, and how two men or woman can have both full rights to those children. The dynamics of a man and man relationship are far different from a man and woman.
-when it comes to divorce there needs to be laws that protect each person. With heterosexual marriages usually the woman gets custody of the children. But what about in a two man homosexual relationship? There needs to be specific laws and rights that help guide these decisions. The dynamics of the relationships cannot be forced into the same laws. It makes no sense.
-This is why I believe homosexual relations need there separate form of union. I think even gay men and lesbian women need separate laws for each of their relations. Because those relationships are still very different and have different dynamics. The name is not whats important but whats important is that all the same rights are offered to all relationships...insurance, children rights..etc...etc..etc.
-the same goes for Polygamous people. If its becomes legal they would need their own separate form of union that would support the dynamics of those relationships.
So again, everyone gets on me for my biological talk. But I am just saying it proves that these relationships are not the same and should be treated for their own unique issues that arise in these relationships. So lets embrace our differences and not try and create a county where everyone needs to be viewed the same. There is nothing wrong with viewing and loving our differences.
