What's new

Lockout!!!

Great! Just great! Now I can't have my nachos, large coke and pretzel for $18.95.

Come over to my house twice a week and I will sell you exactly that. I will even throw in a DVD of some Jazz games on my 65" plasma. Be just like being at the game.
 
there are several problems with your logic. i can argue the players' side of this argument, too, but the way you get there has some logical flaws.

the owners have created a business that allows guys to get filthy stinkin' rich for playing basketball, but under the current system, THEY take all the financial risks. the players right now are GUARANTEED 57% of BRI minus certain costs, or around $2 billion... no risk involved there. they show up, they get a paycheck.

the owners, on the other hand, assume all the risks of running the business, which is why many of them lose money and a few of them lose boatloads of money. some are billionaire playboys who are fine losing the money because their team is just a high-priced toy they like to entertain themselves with. but others are serious businessmen who accept tons of risk and loss just to be kingmakers for a bunch of spoiled kids. so the players are just as much at fault here... they're failing to compromise so that they can make $2.1 billion instead of $1.9 billion at the expense of owners who have invested in creating a machine that makes them uber-rich. and if you think creating an NBA where players can make that kind of money is easy, talk to someone who has played ball in europe.

like i said, that's just one side of the argument, and i can articulate and sympathize with both sides...i just think you're oversimplifying.

This part isn't even true all the time. They don't have to show up to get their check.
 
I say we slowly upload old playoff games for the Jazz until the lockout ends in a feeble attempt to keep us entertained.

...EXCELLENT idea! I'm still wanting to buy the Jazz vs. Golden State semi's DVD when the contrast of styles (hip hop vs. team play) was clearly on display for all to see!
 
I don't support either side. Yes both sides have valid arguments but in the end I don't get to see NBA basketball (the Jazz). The players and owners can be selfish so can I. Screw both of them.:mad:
 
I strongly suspect the other thing they're doing is counting depreciation of some fixed assets. For example, many NBA teams have an ownership stake in the building they play in. I wouldn't be shocked at all if they're counting the amount that the physical building decreases in value each year as an operating loss while not counting in other revenues the building creates (concerts, Disney events, rodeos, Monster Trucks, etc etc).

It seems/seemed REALLY fishy for a system built on being flexible based on income (BRI) to get so out of wack that far more than half the teams lost money last year.

I hate rich people. The end.
 
Good bye 2011 season and thank you for making the old teams get even older while we didn't have to watch our team get smashed by them.
 
Back
Top