At least you admitted it.
Lowry anybody?
- Thread starter stitches
- Start date
Houston let him walk at the same time they let Dragic go. I'd want to know more about the circumstances there. I'm wary of players who change teams more than a few times. Sometimes guys get paid and they don't care as much anymore. The Jazz are building a culture based around working hard and improving individually. Lowry would need to fit that and help lead it.
A guy with his skills shooting/scoring would put the Jazz on a higher level though.
A guy with his skills shooting/scoring would put the Jazz on a higher level though.
Seems kind of like a hot-head.
GVC
Well-Known Member
Houston didn't let him walk, they trade him for one of the first round picks that was turned into James Harden. Memphis moved him, but also received a first round pick.
He clashed with Kevin McHale in Houston. As Cy says, he has a bit of a reputation as a hot head. He's a competitive player though, which is mostly good.
Stifle Tower
Punch Bowl Re-Filler
Career he has shot just under 42%/35%. He'll be 30 next year. So those numbers AREN'T likely to improve and will start to go down. I realize we've suffered through lousy PG's since Deron left, but that is NOT the kind of shooting we need...especially given his big contract. We'd trade all those assets (and have to give up Booker as a cap casualty) for a player who is under contract for 2 more years and then has a PLAYER option. Oh yeah, do we have a chance of bringing Tomic over if we've used up most of our cap in the trade?
No thanks. Lowry is certainly an upgrade over Burke but not a big enough one to justify all the assets lost.
I also think we're looking at this wrong. Hayward, Burks and Hood are essentially the play makers when they are in the game (and at least one of them would be for 48 mins). What we need is a Derek-Fisher type PG: someone who can just fire 3's and play decent defense. I hate to mention that guy's name because I LOATHE him. But in his prime, he was the perfect complement to the ball-dominant Kobe. Not that Burks, Hayward or Hood are that good, but they certainly run the plays. So is there a combo guard or SG who could guard opposing ones and wouldn't need the ball in his hands all the time?
No thanks. Lowry is certainly an upgrade over Burke but not a big enough one to justify all the assets lost.
I also think we're looking at this wrong. Hayward, Burks and Hood are essentially the play makers when they are in the game (and at least one of them would be for 48 mins). What we need is a Derek-Fisher type PG: someone who can just fire 3's and play decent defense. I hate to mention that guy's name because I LOATHE him. But in his prime, he was the perfect complement to the ball-dominant Kobe. Not that Burks, Hayward or Hood are that good, but they certainly run the plays. So is there a combo guard or SG who could guard opposing ones and wouldn't need the ball in his hands all the time?
He's on a fantastic contract! He's barely making more than Booker.
Stifle Tower
Punch Bowl Re-Filler
HUH? Isn't Lowry making $12M?
Booker is at $4.8M next season. To make the trade, I'm pretty sure Utah would need to decline the option on Booker's contract, and renounce some of their other FA's and/or exceptions to get under the cap far enough to absorb the difference in incoming salaries.
Yeah, he is making 12 million a year for the next 3 years. Siro gon Hack style making statements without a fact check.
I don't know why I thought he was only making around 9m. Still, it's a pretty good contract.
Hotdog
Well-Known Member
I miscounted how many seasons hes played. But ya, that equals not fact checking.
Let's see. What was your last non fact checking statement. You said when making a trade salaries have to match up regardless if you are under the cap. Wrong. Next time fact check before you make statements. K?
How the hell can you call yourself a basketball fan and not even know how trading works? Please don't post any trades. K?
We all got our Hack moments.