These fat clowns acting like Devin Booker is special because he can shoot open 3 pointers.
Lyles.
Lyles.
I think I'm pretty comfortable with Lyles over Booker.
Apart from Booker, who would we have rather taken? I'm just sad about narrowly missing out on Justise. Maybe Dekker?
Lindsey seems to think Lyles can be our Draymond Green.
Lyles is soft. Absolutely nothing to do with Green in that respect(and defensively in general)... Offensively he might be able to be a playmaking 4. He runs the floor well(might speed up the pace a bit), has good feel for the game, makes nice reads and passes well, not sure how good his handle is.
People thought Exum was going to be a bad defender too.
No one thought Green was going to be at defense in the NBA.
Is there some deadline the Jazz or another team is waiting for? We're trading this guy right? The more I think about it the less and less I like it.
With Exum it was different. Exum has elite quickness and size - it was a question of him learning proper technique and desire to defend. Lyles doesn't have elite measurables. Exum's D was a question simply because he never had to defend at a serious level, not because his D has been tested and proven to be unable to defend. With Lyles it has been tested and it has been less than stellar. He isn't fast enough to guard 3 and he hasn't shown ability(or willingness) to fight for position in the post defensively.
Also, citing the exceptions to the rule is not really a good way to predict the future success of a prospect. You'd have better success by going with the majority of players that have had similar success defending in college. Of course he can improve tremendously and some day become a DPOY candidate, but lets be honest with ourselves - what do we really think is the chance of that happening?