No. Hence, likely.
No, you said we would have two lotto picks next year, meaning two shots at Shabazz. Only one of those would give us a shot as Shabazz.
No. Hence, likely.
No, you said we would have two lotto picks next year, meaning two shots at Shabazz. Only one of those would give us a shot as Shabazz.
Meaning two shots at winning the lottery, to get Shabazz. I'm not sure what's so tough to figure out here.
One of the picks is Top 6 protected, meaning we don't get it if it's number 1. I'm not sure what's so tough to figure out here.
Did anyone notice how the Warriors GM winked to someone in the crowd after they got the pick?
Well one thing in all this - Emeka Okafor probably just became very available.
NOH will have NO post offense with Davis/Okafor at the 4/5
On second thought, **** having Okafur for two more years. It would severely hinder our ability to go after a big FA next year.
Yeah, because Utah dominates the FA market.
I would only do the trade for 10 if Lillard is available at 10. We need offense, especially if we trade Al, and I think Lillard could provide that, but any other player I don't think will be worth getting Okafor for two years.
Yeah, because Utah dominates the FA market.
I would only do the trade for 10 if Lillard is available at 10. We need offense, especially if we trade Al, and I think Lillard could provide that, but any other player I don't think will be worth getting Okafor for two years.
Yeah, because Utah dominates the FA market.
I would only do the trade for 10 if Lillard is available at 10. We need offense, especially if we trade Al, and I think Lillard could provide that, but any other player I don't think will be worth getting Okafor for two years.
So we should tie up 14M in some mediocre ****head? Brilliant.
Ain't gonna be available at 10. Lilliard is the flavor of the day and Chad Ford's love intrest. On the drive home some national NBA writer was talking Lilliard at No. 2 for Charlotte.
Ain't gonna be available at 10. Lilliard is the flavor of the day and Chad Ford's love intrest. On the drive home some national NBA writer was talking Lilliard at No. 2 for Charlotte.
Okafor is a pretty good defender (or at least he use to be) and we don't really need to be spending money in the next two years. We could always amnesty him if we really wanted too.
I would take a Jefferson for Okafor with nothing else involved.
I just want Jefferson gone.
No way would I do that.