What's new

Monday Spurs VS Jazz 7 PM ET ---- Front row seat!

I agree. Not at max money anyway.

Leonard shoots 43 percent from the field, 32% from 3, doesn't get to the line that much, only 2.5 assists (less than "ball hog" Burks)

He rebounds well and plays good defense...... we already do those things at an elite level. Held two pretty good offensive teams to lowest point totals of the year. I'm not sure we really need his defense anymore.

If the Spurs had hit their numerous wide open shots, it could have been an entirely different game. It was an overall good defensive game for the Jazz, but it's too early to say that our defense is bulletproof.
 
Does anyone miss Kanter?
I miss him a little.
I always thought he was fun and made me laugh. And I felt he was pretty good at basketball for a 22 year old.

Don't miss him alot though
 
If the Spurs had hit their numerous wide open shots, it could have been an entirely different game. It was an overall good defensive game for the Jazz, but it's too early to say that our defense is bulletproof.

They were completely out of sync. Take a wild guess as to why.
 
I miss him a little.
I always thought he was fun and made me laugh. And I felt he was pretty good at basketball for a 22 year old.

Don't miss him alot though

I miss Kanter the character-- not Kanter the basketball player. Like, at all. It turned me on seeing Gobert out there.
 
If the Spurs had hit their numerous wide open shots, it could have been an entirely different game. It was an overall good defensive game for the Jazz, but it's too early to say that our defense is bulletproof.

So you are saying either you did not watch the game or you are a hater.
 
I love how so many whiners here complain about "oh you can't compliment Kanter without trashing the jazz" and now multiple people are posting/liking posts about how the Jazz are so good now that Kanter is gone. Hypocritical. Not all of you, just some.

This is a UTAH JAZZ board, not an Enes Kanter board.

I am so sad that I had to point that out.
 
If the Spurs had hit their numerous wide open shots, it could have been an entirely different game. It was an overall good defensive game for the Jazz, but it's too early to say that our defense is bulletproof.
They were rushed shots with guys coming out at them most of the time. Not the same as open. Besides they were taken out of their rhythm early and that contributed to missed shot. The Jazz missed far more "open" shots than the Spurs did. This would have been a complete blowout if both teams hit their open shots.
 
If the Spurs had hit their numerous wide open shots, it could have been an entirely different game. It was an overall good defensive game for the Jazz, but it's too early to say that our defense is bulletproof.
Maybe so..... still I would rather pay big bucks to an elite offensive player to help Hayward with the playmaking duties than a poor offensive player that plays great defense.

I feel that we will be good defensively as long as we have rudy, favors, and exum (plus Hayward is a good defender) no matter who else we have at the wing.

I think we need help on the offensive end though
 
Back
Top