What's new

More Muslim violence in Europe

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 365
  • Start date Start date
I find it funny that the same people who say don't judge Islam by the acts of some are the same people advocating for gun control.
 
you bitching about Pol Pot killing 2 mil when Islam since it's creation is responsible for killing 270mil people. And yet you converted to follow and support it... are you sure you not following in his steps?


UK jihad murderer given weeks of Islamic training by Woolwich mosque, he returned more "radicalized" than ever

His mother took him there to keep him from being "radicalized," and he returned more "radical" than ever. Is this mosque being investigated? If not, why not? "Woolwich attack: Michael Adebowale's mother 'tried to prevent radicalisation,'" by Josie Ensor, Edward

https://www.jihadwatch.org/2013/05/...s-of-islamic-training-by-woolwich-mosque.html

Blatant Cherry picking. In 2004 the FBI sent an agent in a California Mosque pretending to be a radical Muslim. He got reported by people from the mosque shortly. I posted the link before on this website I can go searching for it again if you please.

270 million people in 1400 years compared to the 100 million in the last century from atheists/ antireligion.
 
Some hate you because of your religion, skin color, origin, your point of view, your character and so on.

Do I care about this kind of haters? No. I learned that there are so many idiots around that I'd rather listen to my fart than to those guys opening their mouth and talking crap.

I'd rather spend time with people that have a lot in common with me than people I can't stand. Simple as that. Learning to ignore stupid people makes life much easier. Stay away from people that can't add anything positive to your life. Stop spending time to discuss with people that are blind and stubborn. No need to lose energy for guys that don't deserve it.
 
More typical muslim "honor" nonsense. This time father kills son because he was gay. And that's in Turkey... country which supposed to be more western and less brainwashed by radical islamists.

https://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/f...-case.aspx?PageID=238&NID=47579&NewsCatID=341

Lol I made up that Mao killed 65 million or Stalin killed 20 million? Pol Pot 2 million (20% of his country's population within 2-3 years). I didn't lose a discussion with you, unless you consider fallacies and name calling as strong argument you had no evidence to back your claims once again.

If only closed minds came with closed mouths.
 
Last edited:
Yes, as is every church on the planet.

The historian Josephus mentioned a unique kind of government when he wrote: “Some peoples have entrusted the supreme political power to monarchies, others to oligarchies, yet others to the masses. Our lawgiver [Moses], however, was attracted by none of these forms of polity, but gave to his constitution the form of what—if a forced expression be permitted—may be termed a ‘theocracy,’ placing all sovereignty and authority in the hands of God.” (Against Apion,*II, 164-5) According to the Concise Oxford Dictionary, theocracy means “a form of government by God.” The word does not appear in the Bible, but it well describes the government of ancient Israel.

Ever since Josephus coined the word, many societies have been described as theocracies. Some of them appeared intolerant, fanatic, and cruelly oppressive. Were they true theocracies? Not in the sense that Josephus used the word. The problem is that the meaning of “theocracy” has been extended. The World Book Encyclopedia defines it as “a form of government in which the state is ruled by a priest or priests, and in which members of the priesthood have authority in civil and religious matters.” True theocracy, however, is not government by priests. It really is God rule, government by the Creator of the universe.
 
Show me this creator of which you speak. Or will I only see men telling me what to believe?
 
Lol I made up that Mao killed 65 million or Stalin killed 20 million? Pol Pot 2 million (20% of his country's population within 2-3 years). I didn't lose a discussion with you, unless you consider fallacies and name calling as strong argument you had no evidence to back your claims once again.

Dude, you always confusing killings due to political reasons and religion. Did Mao killed or executed some because he wanted them to convert to atheism? No, he wanted power and his communist ideas of Republic of China to succeed. He killed atheists same way if they were against his way. Did Stalin killed because of religion? No, he did genocide, based on nationality mostly. He could care less if you believe in god or not if you are not for Soviet Union propaganda. Huge difference from "peaceful" islam killing christians in North Africa and Middle east or hindus in India in the name of "almighty Allah".
Unless you accept and learn history and admit that islam and its all history is based on bloody conquer and killings of kafirs you are not going anywhere.
 
Dude, you always confusing killings due to political reasons and religion. Did Mao killed or executed some because he wanted them to convert to atheism? No, he wanted power and his communist ideas of Republic of China to succeed. He killed atheists same way if they were against his way. Did Stalin killed because of religion? No, he did genocide, based on nationality mostly. He could care less if you believe in god or not if you are not for Soviet Union propaganda. Huge difference from "peaceful" islam killing christians in North Africa and Middle east or hindus in India in the name of "almighty Allah".
Unless you accept and learn history and admit that islam and its all history is based on bloody conquer and killings of kafirs you are not going anywhere.

Israel-Palestine conflict isn't one side saying "Moses was the greater prophet" and the other side saying "No Muhammad is the greater prophet" and then killing each other. It is over land. Ireland with the Catholics and protestants it is over who controls the country. India and Pakistan? Over Kashmir. Even Osama Bin Laden blew up the twin towers because he felt America was invading Arabs. Even if the whole world was one religion or irreligion there would be people fighting over the same things. Whenever an atheist kills you write it up for "oh it is other political reasons not atheism" whenever Muslims kills you automatically blame Islam and not political reasons.
 
Because Islam has no political reasons. It is Islam or nothing. Kafirs should convert or be killed.

Qur'an says to kill Kafirs only in self defense, it specifically states not to kill peaceful unbelievers. It says not only to give peace back to peaceful unbelievers but to protect them as well.

Gj quoting only one sentence of my response and not the rest of it that dismantles your whole argument btw.
 
Back
Top