What's new
By:

Move On From Hayward?

Handlogten's Heros said:
Barnes is the beneficiary of playing with the two players that have the most gravity in the league and one of the best passing/playmaking forwards. Wherever he goes next he will disappoint.
Click to expand...
Iawtp
 
Forever Jazz said:
For me I'd think about Hayward to Boston for #3, Jae Crowder (incredible contract and plugs right in to GH's spot), Kelly Olynyk, (Jerebko as cap filler) and a future first or #16. Plenty of cash to pay Gobert, Exum, and Hood going forward and add another significant piece. Plus you likely add both Murrays and let them develop.
Click to expand...
That would be a very lopsided trade in our favor.
Get it done DL.
 
Eenie-Meenie said:
But he has improved every year
Click to expand...

Has he? His minutes, role, and salary have increased but when I look at his numbers there isn't much improvement from year to year.
 
slc said:
Who is better?
Draymond Green or Hayward?
Click to expand...
I think Hayward is a bit better but it's close.
I think draymond is a little bit over rated.
 
NUMBERICA said:
I would very seriously considering trading Hayward for #3 because of contract stuff and my not having much faith that the Jazz will be a much better team than this last year. But hell ****ing no to Harrison Barnes on any kind of max deal. So, so overrated.
Click to expand...
My thoughts too
 
King Cy said:
Hayward and Green are different player entirely, hard to even compare.

Green would not play Hayward's role better than Hayward, and same goes for Hayward in Green's role.
Click to expand...

Is Hayward better in his role than Draymond is in his?
 
ncoloradojazz said:
How is a player who has never made an all star game and isn't a go to clutch guy worth a number 3 pick? Please explain.
Click to expand...
No idea what you are talking about. I said the jazz would be the big time winners of that trade.

Seems that you agree yet want to argue anyway.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top