What's new

My argument for the death penalty...

Justice delayed is justice denied, as they say, eh, Dee? Ya can thank the hand-wringin, candyass, DP abolitionists for the ridiculous procedural delays, I figure.

Yeah, eliminate the safeguards and kill them quicker so we can save lots of money. It's just an accident if they die, anyway. I hate those candyass innocent people whining at their own executions.
 
If we can make the procedural delays even longer, then all innocent DP convicts can die in they jail cell, just like any other lifer. That would fix everything, sho nuff!
 
Don't be stingy with your bullets. Shoot them twice just to make sure they are dead.

Kinda like the "two-bagger" precaution in the case of especially ugly wimminz you're gunna do when your drunk, eh, Marcus? If that's what it is, then, hell yeah. Make it a triple tap!
 
If we can make the procedural delays even longer, then all innocent DP convicts can die in they jail cell, just like any other lifer. That would fix everything, sho nuff!

No, but some of them might be exonerated, as many now have. You know, the ones that would have been killed under the televised Hang 'em High Policy you advocate.
 
Kinda like the "two-bagger" precaution in the case of especially ugly wimminz you're gunna do when your drunk, eh, Marcus? If that's what it is, then, hell yeah. Make it a triple tap!

It doesn't matter how many bags you use, you're still going to end up with a bear trap in the morning.
 
Rules, Marcus? Inna gunfight!? I don't think so! Homey don't play dat.

What's the "double tap" rule, just outta curiosity, eh?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_tap

It's a technique that requires practice. You shoot an aimed shot and follow up with a second aimed shot very quickly. Sometimes policy or SOP is that if you shoot you should double-tap to increase the chance that you completely stop the threat on the first "salvo."
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_tap

It's a technique that requires practice. You shoot an aimed shot and follow up with a second aimed shot very quickly. Sometimes policy or SOP is that if you shoot you should double-tap to increase the chance that you completely stop the threat on the first "salvo."

You could have just referenced Zombieland...

In those moments where you're not quite sure if the undead are really dead, dead, don't get all stingy with your bullets. I mean, one more clean shot to the head, and this lady could have avoided becoming a human Happy Meal. Woulda... coulda... shoulda.
 
Imagine some ole guy, bout 67 years old, layin on his cot, on his last legs, ready to kick the bucket, any ole day. He's been slowly dyin of liver cancer for the last couple of years, screamin 24/7 for morphine, but he never really got proper medical attention because he aint got no money, er nuthin.

This guy was convicted of murder and given the death penalty 35 years ago, but there was always another appeal to pursue, so they never got around to executin his ***. Mebbe he was innocent, mebbe not, but, either way, he's thinkin: "Why didn't they give me that completely painless lethal injection years back!? They aint been nuthin but misery in my life since I hit this here joint anywaze."
 
Then, this ole guy, he gitz his last vistor. Some guy he don't even know comes into his cell, and says: "Hay, there, my name's Biley. 35 years ago I was personally assigned to watch over you: seek stays of execution, dream up new reasons for appeals, all that kinda stuff. Ya might wanna call me your "guardian angel." I heard ya was dyin, so I come by to see if ya had any last requests I could fulfill."

The guy says: "Thank Gawd. Yeah, there is! Please gimme a loaded gun, a belt I can hang myself with, anything that will kill me."


Biley, bein the thoughtful, ever-prepared, living saint that he is, hands the guy a gun.


Then, finally, the prisoner shoots himself---after wastin Biley first, of course.
 
Storytime with aint. I'm honored to be the star of today's nursery rhyme. Of course, it's your standard evasive tactic stylistically and substantively as it distorts the essence of the entire argument in a lame attempt at humor. And I've already addressed the underlying point of your corny, tangential anecdote several times in posts throughout this thread. The only difference is I did it in plain English. You won't do that because plain English would reveal your flimsy argument for being as worthless, illogical, and unfounded as it is. It would also reveal who you are--someone who desperately wants something to be true that isn't, and will stoop to any level of rhetorical obfuscation to achieve it. Basically, a common propagandist, as I've always said.
 
Back
Top