Thee Jazz Fan
Well-Known Member
The alternative is me, and no one wants that. LolFINE. I'll do it, but I'm not happy about it.
Current player draft. Who is in?
1. @Thee jazz fan
2. @gandalfe
The alternative is me, and no one wants that. LolFINE. I'll do it, but I'm not happy about it.
Current player draft. Who is in?
1. @Thee jazz fan
2. @gandalfe
That would be idioticThe alternative is me, and no one wants that. Lol
InFINE. I'll do it, but I'm not happy about it.
Current player draft. Who is in?
1. @Thee jazz fan
2. @gandalfe
Silesian is inFINE. I'll do it, but I'm not happy about it.
Current player draft. Who is in?
1. @Thee jazz fan
2. @gandalfe
Not quite over yet.Who won?
Who won?
You say not to tell the voters the seeding (I assume you mean draft order). What is to prevent them from, you know, going to the thread and looking it up?I'd like to suggest that, after the draft, we have a few non-participants do a seeding of the teams, 1-16, and based the matchups on this seeding. (1 v 16, 2 v 15, etc) Last time we had the three best teams matched up in the first two rounds, in my opinion. We don't need to tell people what the seeding are to avoid that influencing the voting. You will get some blowouts early but much better matchups in the semifinals and finals. The approximate tiers are not that difficult to see.
You say not to tell the voters the seeding (I assume you mean draft order). What is to prevent them from, you know, going to the thread and looking it up?
The draft order would be public, the playoff seeding would be secret. You would just post the brackets and not who was the 1 seed and who is the 16 seed.