I agree they were good at that time. They just didn't win it all. I don't think that means everything. Just arguing with those that are using that as their only reason Brady is better than manning. Once again I think Brady is top 5 all time. I just rank Peyton higher. Peyton took worse teams further and his teams talked relied on him more. His statistics blow Brady out of the water. Winning is factor. Winning in the super bowl matter. But there are many factors. More than happy to hear a good Brady argument. All I am hearing is that the only thing that matters is super bowl wins and that makes Brady the best. I guess Peyton and Trent Dilfer are on the same level.No they didn't.
What was the pats overall record during that stretch? What was their playoff record.
You yourself said you can't simply look at super bowl wins. Im confident that the pats still had a very good record even when they didn't win the super bowl. Can't win it every year. There are other good teams in the nfl besides the patriots
Sent from my 0PM92 using Tapatalk