What's new

Nissan resorts to hiring ex-felon to endorse their products.

Not that felons can't work. But should a company hire guys like him to endorse their stuff? Eh...
Why not? And where should/shouldn't felons be permitted to work? Keep in mind that the more you restrict ex-felons' employment options, the more likely they are to turn back to crime.

At what point does punishing criminals turn from a crime deterrent into a crime incentive?
 
Not that felons can't work. But should a company hire guys like him to endorse their stuff? Eh...

Should? I don't worry about should. I worry about a company not being allowed to hire whoever it is that they want. Let the market decide if it's the right decision or not.

Why not? And where should/shouldn't felons be permitted to work? Keep in mind that the more you restrict ex-felons' employment options, the more likely they are to turn back to crime.

At what point does punishing criminals turn from a crime deterrent into a crime incentive?

Well said.
 
It's hard for pragmatism to take root in a nation filled with puritanical ideologues, I guess.
 
It's hard for pragmatism to take root in a nation filled with puritanical ideologues, I guess.

Common sense is very rarely used in this country... People are still consumed with fighting along the party lines.
 
This reminds me of Nike endorsing DuhBron and Crymello's people of Utah -- I will never purchase another Nike product. EVER. I think Vick is on the same line as child molesters and rapists, so I will think twice before buying a Nissan.
 
Why not? And where should/shouldn't felons be permitted to work? Keep in mind that the more you restrict ex-felons' employment options, the more likely they are to turn back to crime.

At what point does punishing criminals turn from a crime deterrent into a crime incentive?

Felons are already restricted to a lot of things. How many job applications don't ask if you have ever been convicted of a felony? None that I can think of. They can't vote. They have a harder time getting bank loans, housing etc. Why not just loosen up on that stuff too then?

What point? I don't know. I think you are generalizing too much. I brought a specific instance and you are trying to lump it into a huge group.
Depends on the felon on where they should work.
 
Felons are already restricted to a lot of things. How many job applications don't ask if you have ever been convicted of a felony? None that I can think of. They can't vote. They have a harder time getting bank loans, housing etc. Why not just loosen up on that stuff too then?

What I want is for convicts to become productive members of society. I want them to contribute in positive ways. That said, I am willing to try anything. The money that houses them come from me. I am sick of seeing the revolving door of crime.
 
Back
Top