What's new

No more circumcision in SF?

Your judgments drip like venom from your mouth. Nice to see those true colors shine through.

That's funny coming from someone who accuses pro-lifers of wanting to control women's sexual behavior, but agreed that it is more about ruining his ability to be a cad.
 
That's funny coming from someone who accuses pro-lifers of wanting to control women's sexual behavior, but agreed that it is more about ruining his ability to be a cad.

Outside of trying to control men's sexual behavior directly, how are those two things different?

Yes, I'm referring to the person who uses term like "free whores" to describe women who choose to have sex without wanting children as dripping venom. Not much funny about it.
 
Outside of trying to control men's sexual behavior directly, how are those two things different?

Yes, I'm referring to the person who uses term like "free whores" to describe women who choose to have sex without wanting children as dripping venom. Not much funny about it.

It was just funny that after making several judgments about pro-lifer's motivations you reacted with self-righteous umbrage at my judgment of guys and chicks who engage in irresponsible casual sex.

The strongest supporters of abortion are single men who want to use young females for their own sexual gratification without a care for the consequences, so it is time to stop pretending that you care about women's rights.
 
It was just funny that after making several judgments about pro-lifer's motivations you reacted with self-righteous umbrage at my judgment of guys and chicks who engage in irresponsible casual sex.

The strongest supporters of abortion are single men who want to use young females for their own sexual gratification without a care for the consequences, so it is time to stop pretending that you care about women's rights.

You're being trolled, OneBrow, forget it.
 
It was just funny that after making several judgments about pro-lifer's motivations

I'm not judging them. I'm analyzing the likely motives based upon consistency with the policy positions supported. I offered no words of condemnation or support for them. If you felt one motive was more or less noble than another, it's because of your own predisposition, not my words.

you reacted with self-righteous umbrage at my judgment of guys and chicks who engage in irresponsible casual sex.

You confuse umbrage with bemusement and resignation. You're not actually capable of riling me.

The strongest supporters of abortion are single men who want to use young females for their own sexual gratification without a care for the consequences,

Linik?

so it is time to stop pretending that you care about women's rights.

I have no need of pretense.
 
Yes, I'm referring to the person who uses term like "free whores" to describe women who choose to have sex without wanting children as dripping venom. Not much funny about it.

You confuse umbrage with bemusement and resignation. You're not actually capable of riling me.
I have no need of pretense.

So you described me as "dripping with venom" because you weren't riled, but simply confused by my unfunny "analysis based on behavior?"
 
So you described me as "dripping with venom" because you weren't riled, but simply confused by my unfunny "analysis based on behavior?"

I wasn't confused at all. Even trolls reveal core beliefs by the words they choose and posts they respond to when trolling. For example, your notion that an analysis of motives involves a particular judgement about those motives tells us about your beliefs and thoughts. You deliberately responded with words that would get an emotional response from most people, tailored carefully to not directly attack any particular person. Those words, partly by posture but also partly because of what you felt, were dripping with venom. I didn't put it there, just pointed it out.
 
If their sexual behavior didn't effect another life I wouldn't care whether they wanted to act like free whores.

Wow. You don't really believe this do you? (edited by moderator: post was considered insulting and a personal attack)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I wasn't confused at all. Even trolls reveal core beliefs by the words they choose and posts they respond to when trolling. For example, your notion that an analysis of motives involves a particular judgement about those motives tells us about your beliefs and thoughts. You deliberately responded with words that would get an emotional response from most people, tailored carefully to not directly attack any particular person. Those words, partly by posture but also partly because of what you felt, were dripping with venom. I didn't put it there, just pointed it out.

And the pretense continues. All your posts on the subject were trolls, and then you get all self righteous about revealed "core beliefs" and "motives." What a hoot.

PS. What do you think "bemused" means?
 
Back
Top