What's new
By:

Now that the Jazz suck again

babe said:
We're a FAILED nation economically with Trillions in unfunded obligations loaded on our children, and you're voting for pot?
Click to expand...

What your solution? Neither party is talking about the ramp job wall street did on this country.
 
babe said:
We're a FAILED nation economically with Trillions in unfunded obligations loaded on our children, and you're voting for pot?

God I hope this was said with some heavy sarcasm. . . . .not that I think the FedGov should be regulating natural plants. . . . .

The one thing I give Obama credit for is being favorable to the restoration of competitive markets in the beef/pork/poulty and other Ag commodity markets, where cartel giants have been having their way because there's been no enforcement of anti-Trust laws and in fact the Dept. of Agri has been "owned" by the "interests" meaning the very big cartels.
Click to expand...
I'm not only voting for pot. I don't believe the Executive office has much of an effect on the economy, so I vote for them on their real effect of how they enforce the law.
 
VINYLONE said:
What your solution? Neither party is talking about the ramp job wall street did on this country.
Click to expand...

A lot of folks don't understand exactly how things work. Basically, some clever folks have been working the masses with bubble/bust cycles for a long time. The Tulip bubble in Europe several hundred years ago, for example. I think we have to take down the Federal Reserve, and throw some of folks at GoldmanSachs in jail. These are perhaps the central offenders, though there are a lot more. No way should we be bailing out the banks and leaving the clowns who caused the problem being in charge of the fix.

Our major parties nowadays are both funded by the same people, that's why they do the same things. Well, at least in substantial issues like splitting the take.
 
Nate505 said:
I'm not only voting for pot. I don't believe the Executive office has much of an effect on the economy, so I vote for them on their real effect of how they enforce the law.
Click to expand...

Fair enough. You're right about the Pres. not being central to our prosperity. I view the office as something of an unsubstantial "figurehead" or honorary post. The Pres has to be player with the interests, or the hounds of the media will be all over him chewing him up. I have been extremely disappointed to see how our FBI and in general our Justice Dept is weighing in on crime.

For example, I had enough information to send a judge to jail along with a candidate for governor, and the FBI had just set up shop in that place with a great press about how they were there to investigate corruption. They did a sting on five or six judges caught taking bribes, but when I called, the investigator just stiffed me. Wouldn't even take the information. One of the principal beneficiaries of the crime was a Justice Dept. officer. They let the fatcats do whatever they want, and throw every nickle and dime pot merchant in the clink for years.
 
babe said:
For example, I had enough information to send a judge to jail along with a candidate for governor, and the FBI had just set up shop in that place with a great press about how they were there to investigate corruption. They did a sting on five or six judges caught taking bribes, but when I called, the investigator just stiffed me. Wouldn't even take the information. One of the principal beneficiaries of the crime was a Justice Dept. officer. They let the fatcats do whatever they want, and throw every nickle and dime pot merchant in the clink for years.
Click to expand...

You must live in Pennsylvania.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top