What's new
By:

Obama Government Shutdown?

Why do you think I'm a blind supporter? Because the nuances of my political beliefs aren't observable over the course of ten forum posts? Have I accused you of being a blind supporter because you disagree with me? That's egotistical.
 
heyhey said:
I think identifying a group and holding such vitriolic feelings towards them is a large part of why we are in this mess.

I am a Tea Partier and a 99 percenter I think both have posed reasonable grievances with the state of American political power. I think your average liberal and conservative would agree on many more issues than one would imagine. Both parties love this kind of showdown that gives them the opportunity to demonize the others base. We all need to quit buying into the media spin because while we are having an ideological showdown wall street is robbing us blind.
Click to expand...

The Tea Party is composed of blind ideologue, self righteous lying ******** who will take any dirt bag action possible to either get their way or take down the country with them. They're control freaks who deserve no respect. When your starting point is my way or the highway and we'll root for this thing to blow up, you have become terrorist-like and should be treated with the same disdain.

Tea Party is the right wing equivalent of the Communist Party USA.
 
So does anyone other then stoked or sneakers think it is good to have 2 or more parties despite the flaws? Is anyone else willing to say that it would actually be a good thing if their own party didn't control everything? More specifically, can any democrat or republican admit that bi partisan is better then one side calling all the shots? I'm just not seeing that. I think I see this more from the democrat side, that they want everything controlled by democrats, and less so from republicans right now. Maybe it is because the republican party is severely disjointed right now, so they are being forced to be more humble, for lack of a better word, but it sure seems like the democrats generally smell blood in the water and are going in for the kill.

I guess I am trying to gauge the vibe I have been sensing in this conversation. So I'll just ask outright. Who thinks the country would be better off firmly under the control of one party from now on, and why, and who believes otherwise?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I957 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Sneakers said:
Why do you think I'm a blind supporter? Because the nuances of my political beliefs aren't observable over the course of ten forum posts? Have I accused you of being a blind supporter because you disagree with me? That's egotistical.
Click to expand...

I did not mean you specifically. Should have said "when a person" instead of "when you". Apologies.
 
Is anyone willing to consider that if the provision to force the ACA on all Americans had been removed before it ever went to the supreme court it would have passed with no other major hurdles?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I957 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
LogGrad98 said:
So does anyone other then stoked or sneakers think it is good to have 2 or more parties despite the flaws? Is anyone else willing to say that it would actually be a good thing if their own party didn't control everything? More specifically, can any democrat or republican admit that bi partisan is better then one side calling all the shots? I'm just not seeing that. I think I see this more from the democrat side, that they want everything controlled by democrats, and less so from republicans right now. Maybe it is because the republican party is severely disjointed right now, so they are being forced to be more humble, for lack of a better word, but it sure seems like the democrats generally smell blood in the water and are going in for the kill.

I guess I am trying to gauge the vibe I have been sensing in this conversation. So I'll just ask outright. Who thinks the country would be better off firmly under the control of one party from now on, and why, and who believes otherwise?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I957 using JazzFanz mobile app
Click to expand...

You already have my stance but I think disenting voices are always good. I truly believe that neither the Dems nor Repubs truly represent America. America is centrist. Not conservative or liberal.
 
Within each of those umbrellas ('Dem' and 'Pub') you'll find people with common general beliefs but nuanced beliefs amongst them. Then once one party's belief becomes the norm the nuances that once existed become more pronounced and new parties are born. A dramatic example of this is pro v. anti abolitionism that existed back o the day. There will never be one party.
 
Sneakers said:
Within each of those umbrellas ('Dem' and 'Pub') you'll find people with common general beliefs but nuanced beliefs amongst them. Then once one party's belief becomes the norm the nuances that once existed become more pronounced and new parties are born. A dramatic example of this is pro v. anti abolitionism that existed back o the day. There will never be one party.
Click to expand...

That didn't really answer the question. Do you believe there should be one party in control of everything?
 
Sneakers said:
Huh. I already answered that question.
Click to expand...

No you didn't. You said that there will never be one party. Nothing on wether you think one party rule is good or not and if you support that or not.

I don't think you do but you didn't really answer it.
 
I don't like a one party system but I like it when my party is in power. How's that? But we all understand the importance of dissent. And you never know when you'll hear something new you like.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top