Obama vs. Beantown
- Thread starter Beantown
- Start date
Beantown
Well-Known Member
If they participate in reproduction then they are participating in HETEROSEXUAL relations. So your saying they were heterosexual then turned homosexual? This points to enviromental factors relating to homosexuality.
NAOS
Well-Known Member
What happened to you? What makes you so black and white about things?
(I'm guessing you're not even reading the responses of your detractors. You haven't said one substantive thing about my posts)
Beantown
Well-Known Member
Science and biology is very much considered when it comes to all the many environmental laws of our nation. It also is considered in abortion and other medical related laws.
Darkwing Duck
Well-Known Member
Marriage is a pure social construct and an unalienable right according to the constitution as determined by those trained to interpret it. Biology is not a determining factor and the U.S. government cannot constitutionally discriminate against those of sexual orientation.
D
Deleted member 365
Guest
Oh man, did any of you see the first series of the Dallas Cowboy vs Cin Bengals game? Man, Romo was on fire. Yet, the Cowboys still showed the ability to stall inside the 5. TO caught a few nice passes. I'm interested to see if he has anything left in the tank. And Chad Johnson, meh, he's never really impressed me that much. I don't think the Bengals are going to be very good this year.
I'm so ready for the NFL!
I'm so ready for the NFL!
NAOS
Well-Known Member
speaking of abortion, have you ever considered reading your own writing?
Beantown
Well-Known Member
I believe marriage is very much a result of biology. The male body is clearly designed for the womans, and the woman designed for the mans. Not to mention the abilty to create offspring, develop families as well genetic lineages throughout our species history.
Darkwing Duck
Well-Known Member
You can believe 2 + 2 = 5, but that doesn't make it true.
Edit: And a quick edit. You may not know this, but you actually DON'T have to married to produce offspring.
NAOS
Well-Known Member
NAOS
Well-Known Member
Beantown,
I'll take your utter silence on all of my many well-schooled points on this issue (human neoteny, female genital morphology, reproduction statistics, etc.) as a sign that somewhere in this world you are groveling at my feet.
By the way, I'm paid plenty of money to know what I'm talking about when it comes to human evolution and evolutionary theory. I think you should know that you are dealing with someone who is certifiably an "expert". I'm not saying this to toot my own horn, but maybe to help you realize that you don't know what you are talking about. That is the first step. Please take it.
I'll take your utter silence on all of my many well-schooled points on this issue (human neoteny, female genital morphology, reproduction statistics, etc.) as a sign that somewhere in this world you are groveling at my feet.
By the way, I'm paid plenty of money to know what I'm talking about when it comes to human evolution and evolutionary theory. I think you should know that you are dealing with someone who is certifiably an "expert". I'm not saying this to toot my own horn, but maybe to help you realize that you don't know what you are talking about. That is the first step. Please take it.