sahlensguy
Well-Known Member
Durant was the man at Texas. Wiggins had to share the ball with a lot of talent players.
Wiggins didn't share the ball much against West Virginia.
Durant was the man at Texas. Wiggins had to share the ball with a lot of talent players.
He looks the part, yes. But Durant destroyed college. Lebron didn't get the chance, but I would have bet he would. Wiggins got the chance, and didn't destroy college.
I just feel like sure fire #1 picks should destroy college. He probably will be great, but I'm not sure "probably" makes giving up Favors worth it.
embiid didn't play muchWiggins didn't share the ball much against West Virginia.![]()

this.I'm starting to have my doubts about Wiggins. He doesn't come off as an alpha dog like Durant, Kobe, or Lebron. There are a lot of questions about his game I have.
I'm starting to have my doubts about Wiggins. He doesn't come off as an alpha dog like Durant, Kobe, or Lebron. There are a lot of questions about his game I have.
of course it's a gamble. but the jazz have a better idea of what favors is than Wiggins and it's pretty clear he's not gonna be leading the jazz to any NBA finals. and really how big of a gamble can a team that won 20 some games last year be? it can't get much worse. might as well get the guy you want if you think he's that good. I think he is, you think he isn't, not a big deal.I think you underestimate Favors. Wiggins is a bet. Maybe a great one. But I'm not sure I throw in Favors to bet on him. In this draft, Favors would go top 5 easy. So you're saying Wiggins is worth the 1 and the 5 to draft him. It might be true, but I'm not sure I believe in that.
Wiggins didn't share the ball much against West Virginia.![]()
this.
tbh if we want wiggins i would rather keep favors and take a punt on Gordon. he's closest to having wiggin's potential imo.
This message was brought to you via a mobile device
kkKKKkkkKKKKkkKKKKKkKKKkkkkkKKkkkkkkkkKKKkkkkkk