What's new

***Official new head coach search thread*** (merged)

My point is that we do not know if he is. I do not want the Jazz to take a gamble with this pick. Your assumption that he is is no less a reach then the idea that he may not be.

Also lol about complaing on what you do in damn near every post. You take one word you do not like and try and go off. Attempt at discussion my ***.

Edit: God forbid you just simply say, "I didnt say or mean or say "always". Then just expalin further. Then I could have said "you're right you didn't say "always", Sorry that I cam off that way. I was talking more about the idea then your post specifically. Just trying to show that it is a gamble. One I do not want the Jazzz to take.

But then you wouldn't have anything to complain about. Whatever your problem with me is. Get over it already. Jesus.

I disagree, and I can point to evidence. What evidence do you have for your claim besides the general yarn of "players aren't always coaches"? Srs question.
 
Show me a list, not sure it works. Who among current coaches is an HOFer? Pops, no, Phil, no. Any other good ones? McHale is so so.

Here is a list of failed "stars" from bleacher report:

Isiah Thomas
Bob Cousy
Willis Reed
Elgin Baylor
Bill Cartwright
Kurt Rambis
Wes Unseld

Maybe Jason Kidd will work his way onto that list.
 
Also Locke made the case that the Hall of Fame player that jumped straight to Head Coach has been one of the more successful routes to being a successful coach. The only person that flopped was Magic Johnson.

To my knowledge, the only success had been Larry Bird, and who knows if he could have kept it up?
 
Show me a list, not sure it works. Who among current coaches is an HOFer? Pops, no, Phil, no. Any other good ones? McHale is so so.

Here is a list of failed "stars" from bleacher report:

Isiah Thomas
Bob Cousy
Willis Reed
Elgin Baylor
Bill Cartwright
Kurt Rambis
Wes Unseld

Locke based it off of having over a 50% winning percentage and at least 200 wins. The list from what I remember was:

Danny Ainge
Mark Jackson
Larry Bird

I can't remember the rest but it here is the link to the podcast:

https://weareutahjazz.com/lockedonjazz/

Its yesterday the 13th podcast
 
Locke based it off of having over a 50% winning percentage and at least 200 wins. The list from what I remember was:

Danny Ainge
Mark Jackson
Larry Bird

I can't remember the rest but it here is the link to the podcast:

https://weareutahjazz.com/lockedonjazz/

Its yesterday the 13th podcast

Wouldn't that by itself limit the list to good, or at least decent, coaches? Why not just any HOF with a certain amount of games as a HC?
 
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];824893 said:
"Hey John, you want a boatload of money and the power to run the team?"

"No"

"Hey John, you want less money and less power? You can be teh assistant!"

"....."

I think the thinking here is that John would prefer the assistant job. He is definitely not hurting for money. He probably has more money than any of us will ever see. Maybe even more than Professor NaOS or PKM.

I think you know nothing about Stockton if you think he would quit.

Yeah, if Stock were to be a bad head coach, he would take a different role with the team. That is not quitting.
 
Locke based it off of having over a 50% winning percentage and at least 200 wins. The list from what I remember was:

Danny Ainge
Mark Jackson
Larry Bird

I can't remember the rest but it here is the link to the podcast:

https://weareutahjazz.com/lockedonjazz/

Its yesterday the 13th podcast

What about Bill Russell? Yes, his years with Seattle and Sacramento was less than stellar, but you can't discount his time as player/coach, can you?
 
@1280Spence: RT @WojYahooNBA Jazz have been granted permission to interview Bulls assistant Adrian Griffin for head coaching job, sources tell Yahoo.
 
Back
Top