Big Maple is too 'on the nose' if you know what that means.Big Maple is a far better nickname than calling a rookie "Coach"
Big Maple is too 'on the nose' if you know what that means.Big Maple is a far better nickname than calling a rookie "Coach"
So you are saying the nickname is too good to be a good nickname?Big Maple is too 'on the nose' if you know what that means.
Probably Cling Kong cuz it's a GOATED name....Also who's gonna win when Cling Kong goes up against a Maple tree?
LOL ..
It's too obvious is what I'm saying.So you are saying the nickname is too good to be a good nickname?
How is "Big Maple" too obvious but "Coach Carter" isnt?It's too obvious is what I'm saying.
It doesn't have the element of surprise Topic Thunder and Cling Kong has.
Yeah but people more or less "expects" someone to come up with 'Big Maple' for him.How is "Big Maple" too obvious but "Coach Carter" isnt?
There's nothing about Devin Carter other than his last name that has anything to do with Coach Carter and it would be incredibly corny to call any NBA player, much moreso a rookie, "Coach".
A good nickname takes what is unique about a player and puts it into a fun name that is catchy to say. Big Maple does that.
So is this contest about making new nicknames that suck ***?Yeah but people more or less "expects" someone to come up with 'Big Maple' for him.
It's lacking the element of surprise, the creativity, the 'X-Factor'.
Maybe Kyle “Fillup-the-basket-powerfully-ski?”BTW, when is someone gonna pick Filipowski and call him
Kyle "The Dude" Filipowski
Again, you make no sense. Filipowski is not Lebowski just because both end in -owski.BTW, when is someone gonna pick Filipowski and call him
Kyle "The Dude" Filipowski