I haven't heard BYU fans claim that. Or at least not rational ones.
I haven't heard BYU fans claim that. Or at least not rational ones. What BYU fans think that BYU wouldn't have jumped to the Pac-12 also, if they had received an invite like Utah? (assuming no Sunday play, etc.) None that I know.
What I have heard people say, which is still very likely true, is that BYU got a much better deal from ESPN/independence than they had in the Mountain West.
And while I'm posting in this thread, can I just say that I found it very ironic that just a few days after some people (Salty?) were saying here that Utah fans don't really care about the BYU rivalry anymore because only the Pac-12 games are really important, Utah fans stormed the field not once, not twice, but three times in the victory over BYU. Guess a lot of Utah fans still care about the rivalry.
I don't know how to look it up. But it seems to me that the home team shares their "gate" revenue with the visitor and not the conference. Now BYU may be paying less to the POS opponents they are now scheduling but I have a hard time imagining the income is higher than it was for games that mattered against conference opponents.
Keep in mind that the league’s annual distributions come from three primary sources:
1) BCS revenue, which was split evenly among the 10 schools after participants’ expenses.
(The expenses are factored into the distribution figures below, so Stanford’s total for 2010-11 includes the $700,000+ the league provided for the OB trip.)
2) NCAA Tournament proceeds, which were split evenly among the 10 schools after participants’ expenses, and
3) Football TV revenue, which was not split evenly (that’s changing in future years).
Distributions
Stanford: $12,419,677
Oregon: $11,427,445
Arizona: $10,785,875
Washington: $9,899,430
USC: $9,366,973
UCLA: $9,258,100
Oregon State: $7,633,219
Cal: $7,609,154
ASU: $7,362,087
WSU: $6,765,558
gregbroncs said:The difference in the numbers you showed is that only one of those games looks like a sell out.
I had this same thought earlier this week. Actions speak louder than words, and that action spoke very loudly.And while I'm posting in this thread, can I just say that I found it very ironic that just a few days after some people (Salty?) were saying here that Utah fans don't really care about the BYU rivalry anymore because only the Pac-12 games are really important, Utah fans stormed the field not once, not twice, but three times in the victory over BYU. Guess a lot of Utah fans still care about the rivalry.
What I said about ESPN is just stuff I read on cougarboard.com or .net or whatever. We all know people who hang out on sports message boards are huge tools though, so I probly should've taken it with a grain of salt.
We have a full PAC 12 schedule, we don't need to play an emotionally draining game against byu every year.
Must be galling that BYU can still get 13,000+ more fans to their non sell out games than Utah can to their sell outs. And that 20,000 more people got to watch last year's BYU-Utah game in person than this year's.![]()
I've heard plenty of morons claim that BYU got the better deal. Nice to see that at least some rational people follow BYU sports.I haven't heard BYU fans claim that. Or at least not rational ones. What BYU fans think that BYU wouldn't have jumped to the Pac-12 also, if they had received an invite like Utah? (assuming no Sunday play, etc.) None that I know.
What I have heard people say, which is still very likely true, is that BYU got a much better deal from ESPN/independence than they had in the Mountain West.
And while I'm posting in this thread, can I just say that I found it very ironic that just a few days after some people (Salty?) were saying here that Utah fans don't really care about the BYU rivalry anymore because only the Pac-12 games are really important, Utah fans stormed the field not once, not twice, but three times in the victory over BYU. Guess a lot of Utah fans still care about the rivalry.
Pot meet kettle.Utah's Bitch getting all defensive.