What's new
By:

OJ Finally found the REAL killer!!!!

JohnStockalypse

JohnStockalypse

Well-Known Member
O.J. Simpson has reportedly admitted to the murder of Nicole Brown Simpson in 1994.
Simpson confessed to a producer for Oprah Winfrey, and he will reportedly repeat the confession to Winfrey during a televised interview. Several news outlets are citing the National Enquirer with breaking the news.
The initial interview took place in prison, where Simpson is serving a nine-year sentence for kidnapping and robbery.
Simpson claimed he stabbed Nicole in self-defense.
The former NFL running back and part-time movie star was acquitted after being charged for the murders of his ex-wife and Ron Goldman.
Click to expand...

https://www.nesn.com/2011/06/report...o-murder-of-ex-wife-nicole-brown-simpson.html
 
Does this really shock anyone? I guess the fact that he is confessing it is a bit surprising, but come on, who really thought he was innocent?
 
What does Simpson have to gain by confessing? A clear conscience?

Self defense? Seems like a pretty brutal scene for self defense. And why not argue that initially?

I call BS on this whole report.
 
I had no idea that today was April 1st. I thought we were into June already.
 
He is still lying? Self-defense. Two people dead how is that self-defense? Nicole Brown's neck was practically cut off.

I lived in LA at the time and was not surprised about the verdict because it followed the court decision of the Rodney King beating. It simply was a payback for the King verdict. It was a scary time after the King trial people were getting beaten, shot at and business were being burned. Both of the court cases showed racial bias at its worse.
 
Surely said:
Does this really shock anyone? I guess the fact that he is confessing it is a bit surprising, but come on, who really thought he was innocent?
Click to expand...

While I normally decline to really base my opinions on media reports, there was this one detail that intrigued me. Having worked for a short while in some labs where I was trained to draw blood from donors to research, and being a chemist and all very familiar with EDTA, the chelating agent used in many wet chemical analyses as well as in hematology as an anticoagulant, the news reported, for short while the simple disclosure that the blood on the gatepost, and sidewalk, was found to have EDTA in it.

Meaning it was put there by someone who had access to blood drawn in a cliniical manner.

I have good reason to just disbelieve almost everything the media says, if they keep repeating the story. When the story dies without comment on it's real significance, I know I'm being sold a load.

Is it possible there was one juror who had once noticed the "preservative" at the bottom of the vacuum vial?
 
They can't try him for the same crime but isn't this admitting perjury which, and I obviously could be wrong here, is a major felony?
 
KrazeeEyezKilla said:
They can't try him for the same crime but isn't this admitting perjury which, and I obviously could be wrong here, is a major felony?
Click to expand...

He never took the stand, thus he never perjured himself.

I can by the self defense angle though. It seems reasonable that Nichole and Goldman attacked OJ with their necks over and over again.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top