My feeling is that if Paul George doesn't commit to the Celtics long term, Hayward doesn't have a compelling enough reason to sign with the Celtics. Then I wonder why on earth Paul George would forfeit his opportunity to become a free agent, test the market and go to LA if that's what he wants. I think Paul George agreeing to a long-term extension is unlikely.
The media pundits, however, seem to think that Hayward should want to leave the Jazz for the Celtics even if Paul George doesn't commit longer term. I'm not sure what their reasoning is, but it seems as though they're lobbying for it.
The media pundits, however, seem to think that Hayward should want to leave the Jazz for the Celtics even if Paul George doesn't commit longer term. I'm not sure what their reasoning is, but it seems as though they're lobbying for it.