What's new
By:

Planned Parenthood Selling Baby Organs

Archie Moses said:
That's because he's trying to conform with 2015 and be politically correct. One foot in the door while one foot is out of the door on the issue.
Click to expand...

You're really showing ppl with ur political incorrectness and insults!!1!
 
Howard said:
Perhaps part of the problem is that we aren't emotional about people killing babies. I respect that you're personally against the act, I cannot respect that you make no action towards that thought, and that through your vote (or lack of vote) you still support it.

Dietrich Bonhoeffer said it best IMO, "Silence in the face of evil is itself evil. Not to speak is to speak. Not to act is to act.”
Click to expand...

You support a nation, and corporations who commit non Christ-like actions to humans all across the world. Where is your advocacy for them? Disingenuous argument.
 
DutchJazzer said:
did not say all woman. i am ok with abortions due to health reasons and rape.
but 78 opr 79 forgot the exact number of abortions are due to the baby would inconvience them. and yes then you are a slut. cus if a baby will inconvience yourself dont have sex
Click to expand...

It really doesn't matter what you're ok with. It's still only your opinion.

I am ok with you leaving and ok with holding you to your word. It didn't happen, and that sucks, but it shows how big a flip-flopping b**** you are.
 
Moe is right. If you're anti-abortion, you need to be anti-IVF for the sake of consistency. This is just a logical fact-- I wonder how many fall into the pool of anti-abortion, but pro-IVF.
 
DutchJazzer said:
so just randomly killing babies is not the same as going into a movie theater and just randomly shoot in the dark?

seems the same to me.
Click to expand...

You choose to see life as unborn children. That's your choice. There's no law that requires everyone else to, so you can't force that on everyone else.

Meaning your gramatically piss poor statement should read:

"so just randomly killing organisms is not the same as going into a movie theater and just randomly shoot in the dark"
 
dalamon said:
Moe is right. If you're anti-abortion, you need to be anti-IVF for the sake of consistency. This is just a logical fact-- I wonder how many fall into the pool of anti-abortion, but pro-IVF.
Click to expand...
Im pro abortion and anti ivf.
 
dalamon said:
You support a nation, and corporations who commit non Christ-like actions to humans all across the world. Where is your advocacy for them? Disingenuous argument.
Click to expand...

I would argue there's a difference between non Christ-like actions and murder. I'm not sure your exact stance on abortion, but it seems like you agree it's a life form and that it's being killed. Now I disagree with a lot of things, but I can't legislate my morality on our nation or other corporations. One morality that we have legislated is murder, we tend to frown upon that. Fwiw, I also disagree with the death penalty.

Anyways, you're avoiding what I'm saying. You're tolerating something you disagree with, murder, so that people have the right to do what they want. On one hand, commendable for being "tolerant". On the other, abhorrent for remaining silent on an issue that is literally killing people. Honestly, if we as people can't be emotional about this subject, but we can be emotional about a lion getting killed, then we have failed as a country and as people.

In summary, you comparing this to other non Christ like actions is the disingenuous argument. I don't agree with drunkeneness but you don't see me trying to start the prohibition here. I just can't get down with legalized murder, which is why I disagree with abortion and the death penalty, and think those are things that we can, and should legislate, and should be vocal about.
 
dalamon said:
Moe is right. If you're anti-abortion, you need to be anti-IVF for the sake of consistency. This is just a logical fact-- I wonder how many fall into the pool of anti-abortion, but pro-IVF.
Click to expand...

I would agree, and I think those that use IVF should have to use all the embryos that are created. Or if they don't want to do that, then adopt. But adoptions cost $30k. Something needs to change there too.
 
Howard said:
I would agree, and I think those that use IVF should have to use all the embryos that are created. Or if they don't want to do that, then adopt. But adoptions cost $30k. Something needs to change there too.
Click to expand...

maybe planned parenthood can offer 9 months abortion and sell those live babies to parents for "shipping cost"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top