Players only meeting.

[One Brow]

Tell me what happened then, provide your evidence. I went piece by piece explaining how everything there could be plausible.

Why would I a timeline to know the official statement is flawed?

 

[JazzyFresh]

That person is opening calling for blood shed in self-defense. What do think they're talking about when they mention being on the front line?

Threatening to kill people for a political cause is terrorism by definition.

 

[JazzyFresh]

Why would I a timeline to know the official statement is flawed?

Prove it

What parts are flawed?

 

[One Brow]

Threatening to kill people for a political cause is terrorism by definition.

Saying you will defend yourself is not threatening to kill for a political cause.

What parts are flawed?

I've already pointed it out twice.

 

[Isaiah 1:13]

The error comes from calling black crime "inproportionate". Once you account for poverty and the effects of differential policing, black crime is proportionate to white crime.

OMG!!!! You really need to be spinning political rhetoric for Fox News. I’d have to question either your intelligence or your ethics.

 

[One Brow]

OMG!!!! You really need to be spinning political rhetoric for Fox News. I’d have to question either your intelligence or your ethics.

Because I'm understating the extent of white crime? You could be right.

 

[JazzyFresh]

Saying you will defend yourself is not threatening to kill for a political cause.



I've already pointed it out twice.

Saying you're "at the point of putting police in a ****ing grave and going to burn down the whitehouse" is not self defense. What it the hell are talking about?

No you haven't, you haven't pointed out a single thing that is flawed. Or by all means refresh it please.

 

[Jazz4ever]

The error comes from calling black crime "inproportionate". Once you account for poverty and the effects of differential policing, black crime is proportionate to white crime.

And now that the protests have damaged many inner city businesses, that poverty will only be going up, and with it, black crime, regardless of president.

 

[One Brow]

And now that the protests have damaged many inner city businesses, that poverty will only be going up, and with it, black crime, regardless of president.

Since when do most inner city businesses alleviate black poverty?

 

[One Brow]

Saying you're "at the point of putting police in a ****ing grave and going to burn down the whitehouse" is not self defense. What it the hell are talking about?

No you haven't, you haven't pointed out a single thing that is flawed. Or by all means refresh it please.

The speaker was talking about how his feeling were going to reinforce his determination to resist when on the front lines of the protest. You didn't pick that up?

I see no need to repeat what you previously ignored.

 

[JazzyFresh]

Saying you will defend yourself is not threatening to kill for a political cause.



I've already pointed it out twice.

Lets not forget

I'm going to take to the senators and if they don't hear us, I'm going to burn them down too.

Explain how that is self defense.

 

[JazzyFresh]

The speaker was talking about how his feeling were going to reinforce his determination to resist when on the front lines of the protest. You didn't pick that up?

I see no need to repeat what you previously ignored.

You're a flat out liar.

Why would that be relevant to whether you have fascist tendencies? It's a very open-ended request.

I didn't say posting a police report was fascist, and you did not post a police report. You posted a confused, disjointed, and partial summary.

Again, I don't believe that officers saw the knife and then tried to wrestle him down.

I missed the part where any actual police officer was attacked.

However, if you really believe in preaching unity and solidarity, go join the protests and spread your message.

Fascism means many different things to different people, and fascist tendencies can be even broader in the scope of what qualifies.

My apologies. Then whoever wrote the police statement produced a disjointed and confused timeline, probably deliberately.

Why would I a timeline to know the official statement is flawed?

Saying you will defend yourself is not threatening to kill for a political cause.



I've already pointed it out twice.