Right. The Thunder have given their youngsters plenty of playing time. They are one of several teams (though it still hasn't been a common occurrence) throughout NBA history giving 4 guys 24 and younger 2000+ minutes. Back in the days when Durrant/Westbrook/Ibaka were that age, OKC also did it a couple of times as well.This has worked out well for OKC. This iteration of the team has not had 5 players 24 or younger play 2000 minutes, but that is mainly becuase SGA aged out last year. If you look at their last few season, their young talent have gotten tons of minutes from the moment they got there.
In doing the research, I'd estimate that approximately 1/3 of the time 4 young players reached 2000+ minutes, those players collectively turned out to be truly quite good, as likely is the case in both recent and past OKC examples. About 2/3 of the time, the players collectively turned out to be nothing all that special. But certainly, most of the players we'd regard as stars had their turns as part of the 24 and younger 2000+ minute list, often in multiple seasons.
Of course the question remains whether they became good because of the playing time, or whether they got PT because they were good (or some combination). It didn't work in every case, of course--Darius Bazley nearly reached the 2000 minute-mark one season.
Last edited:
