What's new

Police Power and Racial Tensions in Ferguson, Missouri

Really, it's not that far in the closet.

More seriously, it's about bias, not hate.

So I must be pro-gay rights, fascinated by Islam and saddened when it gets dragged through the mud by fanatical *** wipes, jealous of freakishly good black athletes, a major fan of Asian food and Asian chicks while at the same time being jealous of their intellectual dominance, all while being married to a fat chick -- because deep down, I'm trying to hide my bias?

Tell me more.


As they should. He should be responsible for every bitch that was burned down.
 
I'm sure they'll be some but the one major difference between this and Ferguson is there wasn't the polarization of opinion along racial lines regarding the incident. Pretty much everyone, black, white, whatever felt this cop should be facing some serious jail time - except the jurors and the prosecutor, apparently.

Do you know if the prosecutor recommended any charges to the grand jury?
 
So I must be pro-gay rights, fascinated by Islam and saddened when it gets dragged through the mud by fanatical *** wipes, jealous of freakishly good black athletes, a major fan of Asian food and Asian chicks while at the same time being jealous of their intellectual dominance, all while being married to a fat chick -- because deep down, I'm trying to hide my bias?

Tell me more.

You can be pro-gay-rights and has an unconscious bias against gays at the same time, absolutely. I don't make any claim for either causing the other; in all likelihood, you're not aware enough of your biases to compensate in such a fashion.

As should go without saying, the same applies to me an my biases.

As they should. He should be responsible for every bitch that was burned down.

Why?
 
If I am at a bank when someone is robbing it, and I don't like the decision that the bank made to deny me a car loan, and I tell the robber to go ahead and "shoot that bitch" as I point to the loan officer who denied me, then I should be held responsible for the loan officer getting shot -- along with the bank robber.

Totally different, but not really.

Also, your take on my biases (is that the correct plurality??) is a total joke. I love you still, but damn, man.
 
If I am at a bank when someone is robbing it, and I don't like the decision that the bank made to deny me a car loan, and I tell the robber to go ahead and "shoot that bitch" as I point to the loan officer who denied me, then I should be held responsible for the loan officer getting shot -- along with the bank robber.

Totally different, but not really.

Yeah, the difference between hearing you won't get a loan and that your stepson's killer will not even be indicted, such a small thing to you. For you, it's not at all mitigated the hours of time that Head has joined with his wife in the pleas for non-violence. No, that one comment is enough to convict the man in your eyes.

Also, your take on my biases (is that the correct plurality??) is a total joke. I love you still, but damn, man.

Your previous paragraph is more than enough evidence for my take on your biases.
 
This seems appropriate for this thread

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014...-walking-with-hands-in-pockets_n_6242584.html

I saw it on Jon Stewart's show. Now the sheriff said he acted appropriately for stopping a black man for making people nervous by walking with his hands in his pockets. Our country is a sad state of affairs when the guy had to explain WHY he had to walk with hands in pockets (cold weather)...

The system is definitely broken.

The guy is lucky he didn't get shot. Obviously the sheriff was one of the "cool" policemen.
 
Cop cleared for Eric Garner chokehold (banned technique for 21 years) conveniently the cops called it a headlock rather than a chokehold.

https://nypost.com/2014/12/03/cop-cleared-in-eric-garner-chokehold-death/

I would really like to see what the grand jury saw because I would have voted to indict based on what I saw. The officer broke policy and it lead to this man's death. He wasn't going anywhere.

Edit: This discussion is so much better with HH on ignore. I highly recommend it.
 
Last edited:
I would really like to see what the grand jury saw because I would have voted to indict based on what I saw. The officer broke policy and it lead to this man's death. He wasn't going anywhere.

Coroner ruled his death a homicide. The entire physical altercation was caught on video camera and put on Youtube for the public to see. He was unarmed and physically assaulted which ultimately led to his death. The only people to be indicted on any charges from the scenario were the guy who videoed it and his girlfriend. There are no facts that need to come to light - it's a fact there is disgusting corruption among police depts and local govs... The stats on pig related civilian deaths and no charges are STARTLING for the common layman who has their head in the sand about blacks being targeted. NYPD is disgusting and filled with vile humans. All these racist PIGS in the NYPD probably sat on their lazy fat asses eating donuts 13 years ago while the real heroes tried to save lives at the WTC.
 
Back
Top