What's new
By:

Potential Trade Targets

I'd like to see us trading THT to somewhere he can get playing time, but he's also just a single injury away from being back in most likely. Unless something really great turns up, I say we stay put.
 
NAOS_pt2 said:
trading KO definitely messes with the chemistry/rhythm.
Click to expand...
I think it hurts the vibes as KO seems like a great hang. Recently on court KO hasn't been fantastic but I think KO's biggest value is when we have injuries he becomes an effing all star. I have wondered if DA would like to see Hendricks after the deadline play in the KO spot in the rotation... I don't think that would sink us per se... but it would be more challenging.

So there are 3 issues on KO:

1- He's our best passer.
2- He's a great injury insurance policy.
3- He's a vibes god.

Biggest benefits in trading him:

1- whatever we get back in return
2- Getting Tay Henny more PT

If #1 is low then I am not sure you can move him. Is it worth 2-3 second rounders? I know your answer already. I think the tipping point is a late first or a potentially valuable swap... and I likely prefer the ladder.
 
hgb said:
I'd like to see us trading THT to somewhere he can get playing time, but he's also just a single injury away from being back in most likely. Unless something really great turns up, I say we stay put.
Click to expand...
I think if JC, Dunn, or Collin got hurt that could be true but I also look at the minutes allocation we have right now and think we'd be fine ramping up a couple guys minutes.
 
Handlogten's Heros said:
https://theathletic.com/5205884/2024/01/16/knicks-trade-deadline-facilitator-quentin-grimes/

Here's a surprise target with Jordan Clarkson as the bait. He's mentioned in the article... Grimes an improvement over Ochai... is he better than Tech? Maybe eventually. Imagine getting the apple of NY's eye in the JC trade instead of the Don deal... and then turning him into something. Its too juicy to pass up. Let's do it.
Click to expand...
Brogdon is probably #1 on the "list". But with their salary structure, needs, etc. its a nice fit with JC's deal.

JC/Yurt for Evan/Grimes.
 
I'm not convinced that Keyonte will not be a better player than Murray by the end of next year. If he is, what is the point in trading for Murray?
 
framer said:
I'm not convinced that Keyonte will not be a better player than Murray by the end of next year. If he is, what is the point in trading for Murray?
Click to expand...
I love Keyonte but I would need to see his shooting efficiency get better before we start talking like that.
 
framer said:
I'm not convinced that Keyonte will not be a better player than Murray by the end of next year. If he is, what is the point in trading for Murray?
Click to expand...
Key is a guy I like, I believe in him, I do think it could go either way though with him. If his shooting doesn't improve substantially I could see the view on him changing quite a bit. Murray is just theoretically such a good fit as the "big pg" who can defend. He has done it in the past but also has become more theoretical. I think you only buy if the price is right... I think the price might be right if you believe some of the reporting. So its tough to pass on as beggers can't be choosers right.

1- big backcourt player
2- under contract long term at a fine price
3- available
4- may not cost an arm and a leg

I still prefer the wait and develop route with what we have going with Dunn/Sexton... but if they sell at a bargain price its hard to walk away.
 
JC/Yurt for Grimes/Fournier... do we need to add something? That checks a lot of boxes for me and I think Hardy can work with Grimes. Adds some nice salary flexibility to use to retain Simone/KO/Lauri renegotiate and extend.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top