D
Deleted member 365
Guest
So basically we'd need to lower the minimum wage to $3.00 per hour, get rid of of the 40 hour work week, and unload everyone off health insurance and onto some government source/let them go uninsured?
Primer on Government Spending
- Thread starter babe
- Start date
So basically we'd need to lower the minimum wage to $3.00 per hour, get rid of of the 40 hour work week, and unload everyone off health insurance and onto some government source/let them go uninsured?
Gyp Rosetti
Banned
$3.00 seems generous. And don't we already have things in place to reward companies for keeping things in house?
Duck Rodgers
Well-Known Member
I feel bad for the people that can't read franklin's posts and mentally call ******** on almost every point.
The key point that he made that should be completely disregarded is that capital inflows makes up for lost jobs. It doesn't. That's one of the biggest reasons we are in the current position that we are. The goal in trade is always to get as close to equilibrium as you can. If you can run surplus, even better. But all capital inflows do is lead to more servitude. It's debt. China needs us only on account of faster growth. If they stopped trading with the US completely and actually started consuming their own production, they would still grow at a healthy rate, while the US economy would completely crash. The US can't win this war. The economy switched from creating things that matter to things that don't matter, and the transition back would take decades. Look at what is defined as "output" now in the US. You will laugh your *** off. Just because they are able to get away with it at the moment through pump and dump scams(for that is all QE2 is - banksters making more money at the behest of the taxpayer), doesn't mean it will work tomorrow. It's bad economics, and you always get punished for bad economics. The fact that we are still floating, only means we are going to pay a bigger price when **** hits the fan.
Why do you think all of these CEOs met with Barak on the 15th of December? They are trying to pull their money in their offshore accounts back into the United States as close to tax free as possible so they can buy more of our property when the economy crashes. QE is just buying them time. You live in a fascist world folks, the sooner you admit it the better.
Multi-lateral default and currency devaluation is our future. Anybody that tells you otherwise is lying.
The key point that he made that should be completely disregarded is that capital inflows makes up for lost jobs. It doesn't. That's one of the biggest reasons we are in the current position that we are. The goal in trade is always to get as close to equilibrium as you can. If you can run surplus, even better. But all capital inflows do is lead to more servitude. It's debt. China needs us only on account of faster growth. If they stopped trading with the US completely and actually started consuming their own production, they would still grow at a healthy rate, while the US economy would completely crash. The US can't win this war. The economy switched from creating things that matter to things that don't matter, and the transition back would take decades. Look at what is defined as "output" now in the US. You will laugh your *** off. Just because they are able to get away with it at the moment through pump and dump scams(for that is all QE2 is - banksters making more money at the behest of the taxpayer), doesn't mean it will work tomorrow. It's bad economics, and you always get punished for bad economics. The fact that we are still floating, only means we are going to pay a bigger price when **** hits the fan.
Why do you think all of these CEOs met with Barak on the 15th of December? They are trying to pull their money in their offshore accounts back into the United States as close to tax free as possible so they can buy more of our property when the economy crashes. QE is just buying them time. You live in a fascist world folks, the sooner you admit it the better.
Multi-lateral default and currency devaluation is our future. Anybody that tells you otherwise is lying.
D
Deleted member 365
Guest
Yes.
But it's hilarious when people complain about outsourcing. Many of the jobs outsourced weren't jobs that Americans were making careers at. Telemarketing, Customer Service, etc.
Those are were, such as steel, clothes, and car manufacturing were just too expensive to operate here. It's not because of Unions or any of that BS. It's that it costs 200k+ to get a home here in the USA. It takes less than 20k to buy a home in China. Cost of living is so much cheaper in other places of the world that salaries can be lower as well.
Take into effect that had those jobs stayed here, we'd all be paying much more for goods and services.
Face it, companies from steel to clothes will go where the labor is cheapest. We (Americans) aren't cheap labor anymore. Perhaps we will here in a century...
Tax cuts for those companies aren't helping. If anything, it's counterproductive. They're handouts for companies to create jobs elsewhere.
Check this out, bro. I'm like totally going to sneak into this super secret place called the Bohemian Grove where like senators and stuff go to worship the devil. It's packed with the people who really run the universe, otherwise known as the New World Order. This place is super secret and stuff, so you can't like tell anyone we're doing this ok? There are billionaires and really powerful people there, so, security is pretty damn loose. We can just sneak right in the back door with cameras and everything. All we have to do is dress up like a Trojan Horse or a pizza man. Super simple stuff. Then, afterward, we're going to make documentary on how we filmed them worshipping the devil. I know they do it there before I even go. For sure. They're NWO dudes, they worship the devil. Now we just have to find the proof on film and release it to the blind sheeple of the world in a fanatical documentary.
Cool stuff, eh bro? Right on dude.