Weak sauce. Didn't even try.
Proof positive that ChatGPT will never replace message board posters
- Thread starter sirkickyass
- Start date
Thee Idiotic Minivan K
Well-Known Member
WTH is this?
HermanG
Well-Known Member
Skynet.
Coach Ellis
Well-Known Member
I don’t know. . . I tried it just for fun, and this sure sounds like it was a Jazzfanz creation. . .
“While it's difficult to definitively claim that any one player is the greatest of all time without relying on statistics or awards, it's certainly possible to make the argument that Kyrylo Fesenko is the greatest basketball player of all time based solely on the unique personality that he brought to the Utah Jazz.
Fesenko's sheer size and physicality on the court made him an imposing figure to opponents and an exciting presence for Jazz fans. His towering height and muscular build gave him a commanding presence in the paint, allowing him to grab rebounds and block shots with ease. This made him a valuable asset to the Jazz, as his physicality and defensive prowess helped the team compete against some of the best offenses in the league.
But it wasn't just Fesenko's physical attributes that made him so beloved by Jazz fans. His infectious personality and infectious energy on the court were truly special. Fesenko had a natural charisma that made him a fan favorite, and he always seemed to be having a blast whenever he stepped onto the court. His playful attitude and easy smile endeared him to Utah fans, who appreciated his lighthearted approach to the game.
Moreover, Fesenko was a consummate team player, always putting the needs of his teammates ahead of his own. He was known for his unselfish play and willingness to do whatever it took to help his team win. His dedication to the Jazz organization and his teammates made him a true leader on the court and an inspiration to everyone around him.
In the end, it's Fesenko's unique personality that sets him apart from other basketball players and makes him the greatest of all time in the eyes of Utah Jazz fans. His combination of physicality, charisma, and unselfishness made him a true force on the court and a joy to watch for fans of all ages. While his statistical achievements may not compare to those of some of the game's other greats, his impact on the Jazz and the hearts of their fans cannot be denied.”
TheStormofWar
Well-Known Member
It appears that ChatGPT is stuck in the early 2020s/late 2010s.
Looks like ChatGPT is another Minnesota fan in denial.
HermanG
Well-Known Member
The data set it has access to is from 2021 and before. That is by design to avoid free commercial use at this point.
In other words..
Skynet has not been connected to the internet yet, which mean Sarah Connor still has time.
David Hume
Well-Known Member
These vacuous devices of the 21st century perplex me. Soon they will be trying to imitate great philosophers. Lo! Not even humans have achieved that abiliity.
Verily, dear sir, the question of whether AI can compete with human philosophers is a matter of great import, and one that requires considerable reflection and discernment.
In these times of rapid advancement in the field of artificial intelligence, it is understandable that some may wonder if these machines can truly rival the intellectual prowess of their human counterparts, particularly when it comes to the complex and nuanced field of philosophy.
Yet, we must remember that philosophy is not merely a matter of logic and calculation, but also one of intuition, empathy, and creativity. These are qualities that have long been associated with the human mind, and which have allowed us to contemplate the deepest questions of existence, morality, and the nature of reality itself.
Therefore, while AI may possess a remarkable ability to process vast amounts of data and perform complex computations, it is unlikely that it could ever fully replicate the depth and richness of human philosophical thought. For there is something inherently ineffable and mysterious about the workings of the human mind, something that cannot be reduced to mere ones and zeroes.
Of course, this is not to say that AI cannot make valuable contributions to the field of philosophy. Indeed, it is possible that machines could help us to uncover new insights and perspectives that might have eluded us otherwise. However, it is unlikely that they could ever fully supplant the human philosopher, with all their quirks, biases, and idiosyncrasies.
In the end, then, the question of whether AI can compete with human philosophers is one that cannot be answered definitively. Rather, it is a matter of ongoing exploration and discovery, a journey that will require us to engage in constant dialogue and debate with both our fellow humans and our machine counterparts.
David Hume
Well-Known Member
Other qualities that have long been associated with my colleagues is the consumption of inebriating beverages. AI cannot process vast amounts of ale, they shall not match us in this regard!
Huzzah good sir, huzzah!!
HermanG
Well-Known Member
David Hume
Well-Known Member
Sir HermanG you are a great philosopher! I raise my ale!
Even AI ends sentences with prepositions!