What's new
By:

Protestors storm capital

One Brow said:
I didn't realize Pelosi and Trump were so friendly. Do go on.
Click to expand...
Pelosi should be there to challenge Trump, but those hostile to Pelosi should also be there to challenge Pelosi. I would have had the same objection if Trump had handpicked the Senators allowed to see the Mueller Report or preside over impeachment. Pelosi has kicked off anyone who could steer things in an uncomfortable direction. It is unprecedented and has delegitimized the whole proceeding.
 
Al-O-Meter said:
Pelosi should be there to challenge Trump, but those hostile to Pelosi should also be there to challenge Pelosi. I would have had the same objection if Trump had handpicked the Senators allowed to see the Mueller Report or preside over impeachment. Pelosi has kicked off anyone who could steer things in an uncomfortable direction. It is unprecedented and has delegitimized the whole proceeding.
Click to expand...
I agree Pelosi's committee needs to have people hostile to Pelosi politically, and she does also (by appointing Republicans herself). That's very different from appointing people committed to a specific narrative regardless of the facts.
 
We realized that Republicans decided to forfeit their choice of choosing a bipartisan commission to investigate this, right?
We also realize that even right now the commission is bipartisan, with Cheney and Kinzinger. Both of whom are much more conservative than Trump

Facts matter.

I can’t find the clip online and I don’t want to post the entire hearing but officer Fanone said something important in his closing testimony. He said how the FBI is investigating the microcosms of the insurrection, the individual crimes. However, they aren’t investigating the causes, who planned it, and how to ultimately prevent this from happening again. That’s what this commission is doing.

If Repubs really do believe that they were innocent, that it was antifa, and a love fest between tourists and police, then I hope that Brooks, McCarthy, Gosar, Gym Jordan, Guiliani, and Donald all willingly come forward and testify. Let’s clear this whole thing up!
 
One Brow said:
I agree Pelosi's committee needs to have people hostile to Pelosi politically, and she does also (by appointing Republicans herself). That's very different from appointing people committed to a specific narrative regardless of the facts.
Click to expand...
Correct. Pelosi and Cheney are pilar opposites politically.
 
Are we really so stupid that we think this guy needed to serve in this investigation for the investigation to be fair? Why are we setting such a silly standard? My god we’re ****ed.
1627411504786.jpeg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
fishonjazz said:
Unfortunately our president was a **** head and deserves ALL the blame for what happened. Remove trump from the equation, the incident never happens and we don't need to even question how many officers are there or whatever.
Click to expand...
If this is all already known , do you believe this "investigation" is a waste of everyone's time and money? If everything is known from the beginning, is it then an investigation at all or is it simply a show?
 
The Thriller said:
We realized that Republicans decided to forfeit their choice of choosing a bipartisan commission to investigate this, right?
We also realize that even right now the commission is bipartisan, with Cheney and Kinzinger. Both of whom are much more conservative than Trump

Facts matter.
Click to expand...
Then why lie?

What does more Conservative mean to you, more hawkish foreign policy using foreign intervention to prop up 3rd world dictators? No, you see, thats Neo-Liberalism and Neo-Conservatism.
 
Hack is trying so hard to trigger people and missing. Its reallty cute how much he cares about trolling.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top