D
Deleted member 848
Guest
Does a bear **** in the woods?
Does Pinocchio have wooden balls?
Teehee. Jest johks
Does a bear **** in the woods?
Look dude, if you think that the way you were communicating with other posters in this thread was perfectly fine, reasonable, and the others are simply way too easily-offeneded, then go on right ahead. I was just trying to point out that there are better ways for you to communicate your opinions on matters like these. The notion that two people of different faiths cannot have civilized dialogue is a humorous one to me, and it kinda irks me when I see people of two different parties getting into this sort of riffraff. In this instance, I felt that it was your fault, so I tried pointing this out. Seeing as I feel like you're not really understanding my point, I will respectfully return back to my silence, posting lacklustre PKM insults, poorly-crafted photoshops, and KOC-whorship (no homo) threads instead.
Look dude, if you think that the way you were communicating with other posters in this thread was perfectly fine, reasonable, and the others are simply way too easily-offeneded, then go on right ahead. I was just trying to point out that there are better ways for you to communicate your opinions on matters like these. The notion that two people of different faiths cannot have civilized dialogue is a humorous one to me, and it kinda irks me when I see people of two different parties getting into this sort of riffraff. In this instance, I felt that it was your fault, so I tried pointing this out. Seeing as I feel like you're not really understanding my point, I will respectfully return back to my silence, posting lacklustre PKM insults, poorly-crafted photoshops, and KOC-worship (no homo) threads instead.
Finally, undeniable, irrefutable statement with 100% empirical data to support the truth.
Look dude, if you think that the way you were communicating with other posters in this thread was perfectly fine, reasonable, and the others are simply way too easily-offeneded, then go on right ahead. I was just trying to point out that there are better ways for you to communicate your opinions on matters like these. The notion that two people of different faiths cannot have civilized dialogue is a humorous one to me, and it kinda irks me when I see people of two different parties getting into this sort of riffraff. In this instance, I felt that it was your fault, so I tried pointing this out. Seeing as I feel like you're not really understanding my point, I will respectfully return back to my silence, posting lacklustre PKM insults, poorly-crafted photoshops, and KOC-worship (no homo) threads instead.
You related to Nicole Sherzinger? You have about as much class as her.
She's from Louisville, apparently. Probz a 'Tuck thing, kinda like bad-teeth and lack of intelligence.
You have missed what I've tried to say.
You and Trout reacted almost violently to my use of the word "allegedly."
If I can't say that, then what kind of space is there for true respectful dialogue? In other words, if I can't call the literal reading of the bible into question, then it is the forces that react violently that are the problem. It's a book, for hell sake.
I never said I had an ounce of class. Never said a nice head of teeth. Never said I was of high intellect.
Now what?
I never said I had an ounce of class. Never said a nice head of teeth. Never said I was of high intellect.
Now what?
You have missed what I've tried to say.
You and Trout reacted almost violently to my use of the word "allegedly."
If I can't say that, then what kind of space is there for true respectful dialogue? In other words, if I can't call the literal reading of the bible into question, then it is the forces that react violently that are the problem. It's a book, for hell sake.
Way to take all the fun out of it.
Off topic: I'm starting to think that NAOS is SaltyDawg.