We've talked about the definitions of bigot before; they referred to the thoughts and intentions of the actor, not the identity or number of the victim. Besides, as I said, I don't think all the guards here are bigoted, or even most of them. These would be men who regularly undertake protection of people of all sorts of skin colors, religions, etc., and I'm see no reason to doubt they are equally diligent in all their jobs. That's part of the point I've been making.
exactly, the thoughts and intentions of the guards (the actors) is what I was thinking of. I would define them as bigoted actions.
You can type until you're blue in the fingers but you won't get me to call this specific incident an incident of racism. If that response means you lump me in with all the others whose responses you disdain, so be it. I'm not in entirely bad company if you put me in that mixed bag.
If it were a group of three women of Pakastani descent, would they have been treated more favorably? Five?
it wasn't - so why bring it up?
Do you think the behavior was really directed at the doctor who works with poor people in Afghanistan, and their disdain for such people, as opposed to the dark-skinned woman?
aren't they one and the same? or were there two people who were denied access?