I'd say A-
This draft sucked *** and we got a starter out of it.
Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk
This might be sort of true if there was no limit to the number of players you could have on your team.It's a waste because we could have just signed a similar combo guard in free agency without giving up anything. Mario Chalmers for instance.
Every asset can be valuable if used the correct way. Would you call Isaiah Thomas a valuable asset to the Celtics? He was a 60th pick.
Since you can only play 5 players at a time, players who are only a little bit better are a lot more valuable. If they allowed us to play Chalmers and whoever we could have gotten at 12 plus four other starters (for a total of 6 guys) at the same time, you would be right.Chalmers was just one example. The key factor here is, is George Hill THAT much better than Chalmers (or anyone else available in free agency) that you give up a lottery pick for him? No chance.
Chalmers was just one example. The key factor here is, is George Hill THAT much better than Chalmers (or anyone else available in free agency) that you give up a lottery pick for him? No chance.
Did we just learn the value of Trey Burke? I'm assuming the Jazz reached out and tried to trade him for a pick and no one took.
[MENTION=4696]SCS[/MENTION]- what free agent point guards are you talking about?