If we had hired Horny, we could have had both.
You and your what ifs.
If we had hired Horny, we could have had both.
You and your what ifs.
Kind of like you and your "if we were healthy..."
Oh, wait, that's YOUR what if.
I see. So horrible offense and great defense = stardom. Good to know.If you could somehow make Exum's offense as good as his defense, and his defense as bad as his offense, people here would think he's on his way to stardom. Why? Because points are sexy and people are stupid. That's why.
Give some examples of players with these attributes you speak of. (Horrendous defense and elite offense)If you could somehow make Exum's offense as good as his defense, and his defense as bad as his offense, people here would think he's on his way to stardom. Why? Because points are sexy and people are stupid. That's why.
I see. So horrible offense and great defense = stardom. Good to know.
Me personally, I would like him to continue to play great defense and improve a ton offensively on his way to stardom.
Give some examples of players with these attributes you speak of. (Horrendous defense and elite offense)
Then we can see if you are right.
I will start. Kanter. Nope, don't think he is on his way to stardom.
True. I would rather exums rookie year was more similar to bookers (17.9 ppg per 36) or kyrie (21.8 ppg and 6.4 assists per 36) even though exum may have been more effective due to his defense.Well, in order for proper context, they should be rookies. We want similar situations, right?
Devin Booker would be a decent example. People are pretty high on him. Kyrie Irving as a rookie.
All I'm saying is that Exum was above average on defense, below average on offense as a rookie. If those two were switched, people would be more excited about his future because scoring points is sexier than stopping points (not to mention more obvious).
True. I would rather exums rookie year was more similar to bookers (17.9 ppg per 36) or kyrie (21.8 ppg and 6.4 assists per 36) even though exum may have been more effective due to his defense.
Good point.
I don't know the answer to those questions. I didn't watch him enough to know.Did Booker learn good habits ? Did he learn good team defensive principles. Was he good at moving the ball ?
I stumbled upon Exum's pre-draft thread on RealGM and someone posted this.
Kind of eerie :/. Hopefully since the Olympics are coming up we will get some kind of update on how he is progressing since being cleared for contact.
Dante's low steals, blocks, DRTG, VORP, assist rate, shooting percentages, 62% from the line that he rarely gets to, inability to hit the broad side of the barn with a hand full of wheat, timidness, and lack of athleticism have me stoked for next season. I can't tell you how excited I am to watch another year of a botched rebuild based on the dumb *** sales job that Exum-Gobert-Favors are defensive stalwarts and we can ride that train to a 4th seed.
BULL ****.
BULL ****.
BULL ****.
BULL ****.
I stumbled upon Exum's pre-draft thread on RealGM and someone posted this.
Kind of eerie :/. Hopefully since the Olympics are coming up we will get some kind of update on how he is progressing since being cleared for contact.
Well, in order for proper context, they should be rookies. We want similar situations, right?
Devin Booker would be a decent example. People are pretty high on him. Kyrie Irving as a rookie.
All I'm saying is that Exum was above average on defense, below average on offense as a rookie. If those two were switched, people would be more excited about his future because scoring points is sexier than stopping points (not to mention more obvious).
Honestly what gives me hope about Exum was his SL game. Yeah, a SL game. Why? Cause he was going up against Marcus Smart and Terry Rozier. Smart last year was a very, very good defend. Rozier sucks, but he is at least a good defender. Dante toasted em. He got past Smart easily...something not many guys did well last year. If he can come back mentally and physically, we're going to be really good.