What's new

Report: #5, Favors, Burks for Cavs' #1 pick

Yay or Nay?

  • Yay

    Votes: 68 56.7%
  • Nay

    Votes: 52 43.3%

  • Total voters
    120
Done. Of course, you don't post much, but it will be nice to see my custom sig on all of them. This is for 365 days, FYI.

Also, to all of you who thing Tomic is some sort of answer... I laugh in your face. That guy is worse than anyone on our current roster.

Okay, you're on. If we trade up for Wiggins or Parker, I'll be pleased enough that I don't care what my sig looks like.
 
Personally I like the potential of a starting unit of Burke, Hayward, Gordon, Favors, Kanter with Burks as the sixth man more than I do a starting line-up of Burke, Hayward, Wiggins/Parker, Kanter, Gobert/Tomic with Jack as the sixth man.

I'd stay at 5, as I truly believe Gordon has the highest ceiling of the top 5 picks in the draft. He could be a smaller version of Blake Griffin.
 
Guys...Favors, Burks and any other current jazzman are loved and wanted on this team. But ultimately they are not the franchise player we need and are ultimately replaceable.

We must, MUST, get that franchise player. Wiggins could be that guy. Once you have him you can put the right pieces around him and build a champion.
 
Guys...Favors, Burks and any other current jazzman are loved and wanted on this team. But ultimately they are not the franchise player we need and are ultimately replaceable.

We must, MUST, get that franchise player. Wiggins could be that guy. Once you have him you can put the right pieces around him and build a champion.

The same probably goes for whoever we get with the 5th pick.
 
Personally I like the potential of a starting unit of Burke, Hayward, Gordon, Favors, Kanter with Burks as the sixth man more than I do a starting line-up of Burke, Hayward, Wiggins/Parker, Kanter, Gobert/Tomic with Jack as the sixth man.

I'd stay at 5, as I truly believe Gordon has the highest ceiling of the top 5 picks in the draft. He could be a smaller version of Blake Griffin.

I'm sure the cap space will brighten up that starting lineup a bit.
 
Okay, you're on. If we trade up for Wiggins or Parker, I'll be pleased enough that I don't care what my sig looks like.

You guys should make part of the bet be complimenting me in the sig. Dude, that would totally burn the other guy up!
 
Personally I like the potential of a starting unit of Burke, Hayward, Gordon, Favors, Kanter with Burks as the sixth man more than I do a starting line-up of Burke, Hayward, Wiggins/Parker, Kanter, Gobert/Tomic with Jack as the sixth man.

I'd stay at 5, as I truly believe Gordon has the highest ceiling of the top 5 picks in the draft. He could be a smaller version of Blake Griffin.

1. Give Gobert 2 years of solid playing time and development/coaching and I do believe he could be better than Favors at the Center position.


2. Jarrett Jack was one of the best 6th man a couple of years ago with the GSW.


3. If we suck again next year, simply grab either Karl Towns or Okafor and we won't need Kanter.


That's how not to 'skip steps' and we should be set to shoot for Chips in '17/'18.
 
I love moving Trey + #5 for Jabari. We'd just be back to square one at point guard.

I disagree! theres some substance to this years free agent PG crop.

Kyle Lowry is Unrestricted and played like a boss in the playoffs vs Deron. Hes 28, i dont mind him on a 3 year deal, hes really tough.

Isaiah Thomas is being shopped around, the Jazz could try to sign him or Eric Bledsoe to an offer sheet.

The 'fallback' PG that Ive been pimping as a possible starter in the FA threads is Patty Mills.

Shaun Livingston shouldnt be signed as a starter but he could give the Jazz quality minutes aswell.

Im not opposed to taking a flier on Greivis Vasquez either, tbh.
 
1. Give Gobert 2 years of solid playing time and development/coaching and I do believe he could be better than Favors at the Center position.


2. Jarrett Jack was one of the best 6th man a couple of years ago with the GSW.


3. If we suck again next year, simply grab either Karl Towns or Okafor and we won't need Kanter.


That's how not to 'skip steps' and we should be set to shoot for Chips in '17/'18.

Cause we can guarantee that…right?
 
Back
Top